ICE



Daar zit ook wat in.

Here's what I've come to appreciate about the left, as opposed to the right. During my childhood I always heard about 'bleeding heart liberals'. After Oct. 7th I learned just how important it is to have a 'bleeding heart', as my heart bled for the people of Gaza and I watched conservatives being cold and heartless, even justifying a genocide. That's when I knew that although the left may be overly emphatic with all sorts of 'oppressed' groups at least they have a heart that bleeds. The right has bought into social Darwinism and has a heart of stone when it comes to the weak and oppressed. They are inherently racist, colonialist and imperialist and very often dumb as a post. They are no longer my tribe. In fact, I don't see the point in being tribalist at all, because it's divide-and-rule tactics meant to keep us stuck in a culture war when we should be united in a class war. Seems to me we can take a few pointers from the left.





Mike
 
Laatst bewerkt:
WHOA, THIS IS SHOCKING! 😳🤯😳🤯

Looking at this list of U.S. Government agency proxies BASED IN ISRAEL, it would be quite reasonable to suggest that the U.S. are in fact, running a counterfeit shadow government operation there, OR IS IT THE OTHER WAY AROUND?!?!

I honestly didn’t even know this was a thing...

That would REALLY explain a whole hell of A LOT.





Mike
 
Like I said yesterday.

Ex-FBI agent Stu Kaplan stated that ICE agents are bound by Customs and Border Protection use-of-force policy, which explicitly prohibits placing oneself in front of or behind a moving vehicle, except during limited inspection scenarios. He said this policy exists precisely because people may flee during stops.

He argued the agent violated that policy by stepping into the vehicle’s path, thereby manufacturing an exigent circumstance. In Kaplan’s view, the danger was created by the officer’s own actions, not by an intentional attack by the driver.

Kaplan emphasized that flight is foreseeable and legally anticipated behavior during law-enforcement encounters. Courts, including the Supreme Court, have recognized that officers must plan for the possibility of flight rather than positioning themselves in a way that turns flight into a deadly-force scenario.

He noted that the video shows the driver attempting to turn away, not drive toward the agent, and that the agent began drawing his weapon immediately as the car moved, despite having placed himself in harm’s way.

Absent evidence that the woman posed an immediate violent threat such as a prior violent felony or an attempt to use the car as a weapon, Kaplan said deadly force was not justified to stop a fleeing suspect for what appeared to be, at most, misdemeanor conduct.

His conclusion was that, despite being strongly pro-law-enforcement, this incident may constitute a “bad shoot” because the officer violated policy and then relied on a danger he helped create to justify lethal force.



Mike
 

Forum statistieken

Onderwerpen
4.653
Berichten
608.996
Leden
8.695
Nieuwste lid
FAGAgueda5
Word vaste donateur van dit forum
Terug
Bovenaan