The Great Awakening

Wat die Michael Colom beweert klopt dus niet.

Mike
Maar als de kogel van links (vanuit Kirk gezien en waar de wond zit) zou komen dan zou zijn hoofd niet naar links maar naar rechts moeten vallen....
Voor mij is het meest aannemelijk dat de kogel via het kv-vest is afgeketst en naar boven is gevlogen. Maar ook dan is de inslagwond links raar. Nou ja, ik geef het op. Dingen kloppen niet. Het zal tzt wel duidelijk worden, hoop ik.
 
De kogel kwam vanuit Kirk zelf gezien van rechts en daar zat ook de wond. Het bloed gutste van rechts. Geen idee waarom er gesproken wordt van een wond op links.

Mike
 
De kogel kwam vanuit Kirk zelf gezien van rechts en daar zat ook de wond. Het bloed gutste van rechts. Geen idee waarom er gesproken wordt van een wond op links.

Mike
Ik was teveel gefixeerd op de wond in zijn nek (waar de kogel eruit kwam).
Grok:
Charlie Kirk, the conservative activist and founder of Turning Point USA, was fatally shot on September 10, 2025, during a speaking event at Utah Valley University in Orem, Utah. Eyewitness accounts, video footage, and autopsy details indicate the entry wound was on the right side of his head, just above the ear (near the temple area), with the bullet exiting through the left side of his neck.

This trajectory aligns with the shooter firing from a position to Kirk's right (approximately 140-200 yards away, from the roof of the Losee Center building). Video shows Kirk reaching toward his right side with his right hand as blood began gushing from the left neck area, consistent with an entry on the right head and exit on the left neck. Some analyses of the footage note a brief blood mist and impact visible on the right side of his head before he collapsed to his left.
 

Er zijn ook dwarsverbanden: zonder centrale banken ook geen of veel minder oorlog.
Het is centraal bankieren (en het ongelimiteerd geld bijprinten) dat oorlogen juist mogelijk maakt.
Als het geld voor het voeren van oorlog alleen via belastinggeld werd opgehoest, dan zouden mensen het minder snel accepteren.
 
Laatst bewerkt:
Dat is toch exact wat die meme bedoelt?

Mike
De meme legt het verband tussen schulden en banken enerzijds en tussen staten en het voeren van oorlog anderzijds.
Niet direct tussen (centrale) banken en het voeren van oorlog: terwijl dat mijns inziens juist cruciaal is.
Centrale banken zijn nadrukkelijk geen onderdeel van overheden of staten.
Kennedy wilde bijv. het drukken van geld weer terugschuiven onder de verantwoordelijkheid van de overheid: we weten allemaal hoe dat afliep.
 
Mijn laatste reactie is een reactie op dat je zei dat wat ik zei exact in de meme zou staan.

Ik zou verder niet weten waarom het niet in die meme had kunnen staan, maar het stond er in elk geval niet.
 
Imagine there was a violent cult that used scriptures from an ancient religion to convince its followers to do evil things.

Imagine the cult was given its own state.

Imagine the cult was given machine guns, tanks and war planes.

Imagine the cult obtained nuclear weapons.

Imagine the cult started committing genocide against the indigenous people who'd been living in the area where the cult's state was established.

Imagine the cult had huge branches in the most powerful nation on earth, and the powerful nation defended the cult no matter what it did.

Imagine the cult flipped out and started relentlessly attacking and invading the surrounding nations.

Imagine the cult had so much influence and support in western society that western governments and institutions would censor, silence, fire, marginalize and deport anyone who criticized the cult's actions.

Imagine the western media sympathized highly with the cult and spent the entire time framing its atrocities as entirely reasonable defensive actions, and framing critics of the cult as malicious bigots.

Imagine the cult kept getting crazier and crazier and more and more violent, but nobody could find a way to stop it because its actions were backed by this giant western power structure.

That'd suck, huh?

I think that'd be just about the most bat shit insane situation anyone could possibly imagine.

A nuclear-armed death cult just murdering and massacring mountains of human beings with total impunity, backed by the most powerful people on earth? That would be an unfathomable madness.

If someone made a movie about such a thing I'd stop watching halfway through, because I would find it too unbelievable.

I'd be like, come on man. Come up with a more realistic plot line. And come up with a more believable antagonist; nobody is that evil.

I'd be like come on Hollywood, you seriously expect me to maintain my suspension of disbelief when you're putting out a movie about these cartoonishly evil bad guys who blow up hospitals and assassinate journalists and murder humanitarian workers and deliberately massacre civilians seeking food?

I'd be like, you seriously expect me to believe a violent cult could get all this power and do all these evil things and get away with it, just by lying about it all the time? Eventually people would stop believing their lies!

I'd be like, somebody would stop them. Not only does this movie have unbelievable antagonists, it also lacks any believable protagonists. Basic human decency would compel the world to stop all these atrocities being committed right out in the open. Where are the heroes in this story?

And then I'd storm out of the movie theater, glad to be outside that horrible fictional world where such freakish absurdities were taking place.

And then I'd stand in the parking lot and look up at the sky, and thank God I'm back in reality again.



Mike
 
  • Leuk
Waarderingen: Surv

Forum statistieken

Onderwerpen
4.662
Berichten
614.036
Leden
8.697
Nieuwste lid
Sighvatssohn
Word vaste donateur van dit forum
Terug
Bovenaan