Privacy (op computer, telefoon en meer)

**This bill is a fucking Trojan Horse. Period.**🚨🚨🚨

Its a federal surveillance and control system over the entire internet that will be used on adults.🚨🚨🚨

Using child safety. As cover 🚨🚨

1. It builds a national digital ID system through the back door.🚨⚠️

The bill says three times it does not require age verification. That is a lie. Every single protection in the bill only triggers when a platform "knows or should have known" a user is a minor. No platform can prove it did not know without checking. The bill creates a legal trap where the only safe path is to card everyone. Once that infrastructure is built, it does not get turned off when you turn 18. The same system that checks if you are 16 today checks if you are 21 tomorrow. The same database that verifies a teenager verifies a gun buyer, a voter, a patient. This is a national digital identity system built under the cover of child protection.

⚠️⚠️2. It hands the FTC the keys to the internet.**

The FTC gets authority over age verification standards, content safety audits, data broker registries, social media research, chatbot rules, gaming platform safety, educational resources, advertising regulations, and enforcement of the entire act. The FTC becomes the operational regulator of the American internet. This is the largest federal power grab over online platforms in a decade, buried inside a children's safety bill where nobody will vote against it.

⚠️⚠️3. It forces companies to spy on children to prove they are protecting them.**

The audit requirements mandate platforms track and report how many minors use their service, how long they spend, what safety features they use, what reports they file, and what personal information is collected. The government orders companies to gather detailed statistics about children under the banner of protecting them. A bill that claims to protect children's privacy mandates the collection of more data about children than has ever been collected before.

🚨🚨4. It shields Big Tech and crushes small competitors.

The data broker rules exempt Google, Meta, Amazon, and Microsoft because their product is advertising services, not data sales. The companies that collect the most minor data in the world are exempt from the data broker regulations. The compliance costs annual third-party audits, safety tools, parental controls, reporting systems, age verification infrastructure cost millions. Big tech absorbs this. Small platforms die. The bill consolidates market power among the largest tech monopolies while pretending to regulate them.

5. It cuts parents out through school contracts.**🚨🚨🚨

Educational technology companies can collect children's personal information without parental consent if they have a written agreement with a school. The school consents. The parent is never told. Google Classroom, Microsoft Teams, Canvas—they all get direct access to student data through school district contracts. This is a corporate pipeline of minor data with zero parental involvement, written into a bill that claims to empower parents.

6. It kills encryption through regulatory pressure. 🚨🚨🚨

The bill says it does not require breaking encryption. Another lie. It requires platforms to provide messaging controls, content filtering, and safety features for minors. On an end-to-end encrypted platform, you cannot filter content you cannot see. The only way to comply is to either break encryption for minor accounts or disable it entirely. The bill creates regulatory pressure to destroy encryption while claiming to protect it. Once encryption is weakened for minors, the vulnerability exists for everyone.



Mike
 
🚨 Congress continues to build the digital prison by lying and pretending to be protecting kids.

Last night the GOP lead House betrayed its base yet again by passing the KIDS Act. This legislation is an absolute mess and will simply result in many internet companies requiring you use ID verification to use their services.

The actual goal of the lobbyists directing Congress to pass the garbage is to force additional track and trace tech. People will end up being forced to submit their REAL ID’s and/or biometric data to use the internet which makes it easier for the Palantir system to pull your data from these various providers and track you. Is another 4th Amendment work around.

The @freedomcaucus and @RepKeithSelf really need to take a stand on this - they seem to be the only people worried about the 4th Amendment at this point.



Mike
 
🚨 BREAKING NEWS: The Revolt Against
the AI Surveillance Grid Has Begun 🚨

People are no longer just complaining online.
They're taking direct action!

Cutting down, toppling, and destroying FLOCK Safety cameras that have been quietly installed across thousands of towns and cities.

This isn't random vandalism.

It's pushback against a rapidly expanding system
of mass vehicle tracking.

What exactly is happening?

FLOCK Safety has deployed over 100,000 automated license plate reader (ALPR) cameras in the US alone, operating in 6,000+ communities and used by 5,000+ law enforcement agencies.

These cameras don't just catch stolen cars... they scan every vehicle and person that passes: plate, make, model, color, timestamp, skin type, clothing, everything and increasingly video clips with AI analysis.

The data goes to central servers.

Any police department with a subscription can search the nationwide database... often without a warrant for basic queries.

Billions of vehicle and human movements
are logged every month.

FLOCK and similar "AI security" companies (with the broader ecosystem including advanced data platforms like Palantir) are building exactly what they promised: a real-time, searchable grid of movement.

Critics (EFF, ACLU, and growing numbers of cities) point out the risks:

- Warrantless tracking of innocent people’s daily lives

- Cross-jurisdictional data sharing (including immigration enforcement in some cases)

- Potential for abuse, hacking, or mission creep into facial recognition/video search

- No broad public consent for this scale of surveillance

Some cities are already canceling contracts and removing the cameras (Flagstaff, Dunwoody, Denver, and others).

Meanwhile, individuals are taking matters
into their own hands.

This raises the real questions:

1. Do these systems primarily protect the public… or create a permanent record of where everyone goes?

2. Is it acceptable for private companies to build and control a national movement-tracking database that police can access with minimal oversight?

3. Would you be comfortable knowing every drive you take could be searched by law enforcement agencies hundreds or thousands of miles away?

4. When does "public safety technology" cross into mass surveillance without democratic buy-in?

5. Is physical resistance to unauthorized surveillance cameras justified civil disobedience, or should pushback only happen through city councils and lawsuits?

Reply with your honest take, especially if these cameras have shown up in your city or neighborhood.

Have you noticed them?

What’s the local reaction?

Like if this makes you think.
Retweet to spread the conversation.

The surveillance state didn’t ask for permission to expand this fast. The question is whether we’re going to let it continue unchecked.



Mike
 
Amerikaanse burgers door het hele land zijn fysiek Flock-camera's aan het neerhalen terwijl autoriteiten de controle verliezen doordat steeds meer mensen de technologie zien als een ongrondwettelijke vorm van massasurveillance.

De incidenten worden omschreven als onderdeel van een groeiende trend waarbij snoerloze, op batterijen werkende gereedschappen worden gebruikt om Flock-camerapalen snel neer te halen, omdat ze zeer draagbaar, snel en stil zijn.

Massasurveillance moet overal worden gestopt.
 
De camera's zijn de spionnen. De data centres de legerleiding die de soldaten aanstuurt.
Corrupte intel lijkt mij effectiever.

Dick
 
Flock cameras have been out up in the Richland Wildlife Management Area in Florida

The location of the flock cameras are in “miles and miles of Florida wilderness with no neighborhoods or shopping centers, subdivisions or traffic lights around — Why are there surveillance cameras here? Why are there license plate readers sitting at the crossroads of a wildlife management area?

Who are they watching? The hunters? People exercising their Second Amendment rights? Families going camping? Fishermen headed to a boat ramp? Because it isn't just here”

“But here's the question that no one seems willing to ask: How much surveillance are we willing to accept? For decades, law enforcement investigated crimes without building massive networks of cameras that record the movements of millions of law-abiding Americans”

I have ferried these cameras are indeed there, and there is literally nothing around the area

They were installed by the Hernando County Sheriff’s Office which has also deployed dozens of Flock cameras across the county. From what I can find, over 40 installed on county roads

Law enforcement says there are here for

- Recovering stolen vehicles
- Tracking suspects
- Solving crimes in these rural areas
- General public safety

They look like unnecessary surveillance. There is literally nothing around here

I have included a video that shows just how far these cameras really are from society, it’s shocking



Mike
 
Nederlandse inlichtingendiensten worden beschuldigd van het trainen van hun eigen AI op bulkdatasets met miljoenen dossiers van burgers, inclusief sets die ze hebben gekocht uit datalekken, volgens de digitale rechtenorganisatie Bits of Freedom.

Het Nederlandse orgaan voor het toezicht op de inlichtingendiensten stelt dat de inlichtingendiensten de wet hebben overtreden bij de verwerking van deze bulkdatasets. Te veel personeel had onrechtmatige toegang, gegevens werden langer bewaard dan wettelijk toegestaan, en de diensten gebruikten datasets die door hackers waren gelekt.

De Nederlandse inlichtingenwet staat dit jaar ter herziening, met een publieke consultatie die in augustus wordt verwacht. Bits of Freedom stelt dat de diensten het toezicht willen verzwakken.
 

Forum statistieken

Onderwerpen
4.701
Berichten
632.380
Leden
8.705
Nieuwste lid
StanVerhoeven
Word vaste donateur van dit forum
Terug
Bovenaan