Conventional human doctors contribute NEGATIVE cognition to medicine and result in worse health outcomes for patients, compared to AI doctors. When human doctors are involved in diagnosing chest X-rays, for example, their participation takes AWAY from diagnosis accuracy (MIT-Harvard study, for starters, with many additional studies easily found in Lancet Digital Health, arXiv, JAMA, etc.) This demonstrates how human doctors HARM patients by their mere involvement in health care decisions, and it shows why, in many roles, doctors are already obsolete and should be barred from practicing medicine, as their participation harms patients.
These same human doctors usually push vaccines which also harm and maim children and adults alike. Human doctors are, in essence, a great threat to human health and well being, and AI engines have far superior knowledge about nutrition, prevention and reversing chronic degenerative disease, while conventional human doctors are little more than pharma-pimping automatons that push prescriptions for profit, while exercising little or no actual reasoning or cognition.
Quite literally, if all human doctors were replaced by AI between now and 2028, human health outcomes would dramatically IMPROVE, and health care costs would be dramatically lower. And far fewer children would be maimed, crippled or killed by arrogant, ignorant, vaccine-pimping physicians who get kickbacks from Big Pharma.
Note carefully in the studies shown here that when doctors use A.I. augmentation in their decisions, they still have FAR WORSE outcomes and accuracy compared to AI alone. The human doctor, in other words, is so inaccurate that he or she actually overrides the intelligence of the AI and wrecks the decision process, resulting in worse outcomes for patients.
Mike
