Zionisme
- Onderwerp starter fatsnotbad
- Startdatum
Mike
Mike
Mike
Mike
Mike
The Leo Frank Trial Brief of Evidence, 1913
Leo Frank was guilty, and the historical record makes that fact inescapable. For more than a century, activists and pressure groups have tried to distort the truth, but the sworn testimony and physical evidence presented in court in 1913 tell the real story. A unanimous vote by a jury of twelve men, after weeks of testimony and cross-examination, found Frank guilty of the murder of thirteen-year-old Mary Phagan. That verdict was later reviewed and upheld by both the Georgia Supreme Court and the United States Supreme Court.
If you want to cut through the myths and propaganda, I strongly encourage you to read the original trial brief of evidence for yourself. This is the official record of what was said in court, what the witnesses testified to under oath, what the defense argued, and what the jury heard before rendering their verdict. I am publishing this document in full, piece by piece, on my Twitter timeline so that you can see the evidence firsthand and make your own judgment based on the same material that convinced the courts.
Do not take the word of those who seek to rehabilitate Frank’s image. Go directly to the source. Read the trial brief of evidence, study the testimony, and you will understand why the jury reached the conclusion it did: Leo Frank was guilty.
Mike
Leo Frank was guilty, and the historical record makes that fact inescapable. For more than a century, activists and pressure groups have tried to distort the truth, but the sworn testimony and physical evidence presented in court in 1913 tell the real story. A unanimous vote by a jury of twelve men, after weeks of testimony and cross-examination, found Frank guilty of the murder of thirteen-year-old Mary Phagan. That verdict was later reviewed and upheld by both the Georgia Supreme Court and the United States Supreme Court.
If you want to cut through the myths and propaganda, I strongly encourage you to read the original trial brief of evidence for yourself. This is the official record of what was said in court, what the witnesses testified to under oath, what the defense argued, and what the jury heard before rendering their verdict. I am publishing this document in full, piece by piece, on my Twitter timeline so that you can see the evidence firsthand and make your own judgment based on the same material that convinced the courts.
Do not take the word of those who seek to rehabilitate Frank’s image. Go directly to the source. Read the trial brief of evidence, study the testimony, and you will understand why the jury reached the conclusion it did: Leo Frank was guilty.
Mike
Laatst bewerkt:
Mike
THE PROTOCOLS OF THE LEARNED ELDERS OF ZION: "Let's ask some co-conspirators if they're real" edition.
In 1919, the US Senate held hearings on the "Protocols Of the Learned Elders Of Zion." The US War Department issued a report on them that was classified & sealed until 1973!
From its "The Power And Aims Of International Jewry," we learn that The Protocols were shown to 2 prominent jews, who both immediately dismissed them:
Justice Louis Brandeis of the Supreme Court, who called them the work of a Russian antisemite.
Jacob Schiff, the Wall Street Banker, who called them a German forgery.
I guess they forgot to get their stories straight. Anyway, what the US officials didn't know at the time was that Jacob Schiff had recently helped secretly fund the Russian Bolshevik Revolution and had covertly conspired to set up the Federal Reserve--2 events compatible with, and basically called for, under the goals of The Protocols. Schiff's role in those events was divulged only many years later. Schiff also helped fund President Woodrow Wilson's presidential campaign.
IOW, Jacob Schiff, the Wall Street jewish banker who secretly worked to implement the actions called for in The Protocols—when shown The Protocols—said they were a German forgery!
As for Brandeis, he was the first jew nominated to the Supreme Court—done so by Woodrow Wilson, the president who helped institute the Federal Reserve, got the US involved in The Great War, and who was critical in the creation of the League of Nations (along with his close advisor, the jewish financier Bernard Baruch)—again, all goals & achievements called for in The Protocols. Brandeis dismissed them with the now-all-too-familiar deflection, declaring them a product of Russian antisemitism (the holo caust wasn't yet available, I guess).
Don't forget Protocol 9: "We shall replace the laws with our own decrees, which will be interpreted by our own authorities." As Supreme Court Justice, that's exactly what Brandeis did, literally fulfilling The Protocols just a like Schiff did.
For those keeping score: 2 prominent jews directly involved in implementing various goals outlined in The Protocols at the highest levels both said they were forgeries—and their testimonies were classified and sealed for over 50 years. How Convenient!
What does that remind you of?
Mike
In 1919, the US Senate held hearings on the "Protocols Of the Learned Elders Of Zion." The US War Department issued a report on them that was classified & sealed until 1973!
From its "The Power And Aims Of International Jewry," we learn that The Protocols were shown to 2 prominent jews, who both immediately dismissed them:
Justice Louis Brandeis of the Supreme Court, who called them the work of a Russian antisemite.Jacob Schiff, the Wall Street Banker, who called them a German forgery.I guess they forgot to get their stories straight. Anyway, what the US officials didn't know at the time was that Jacob Schiff had recently helped secretly fund the Russian Bolshevik Revolution and had covertly conspired to set up the Federal Reserve--2 events compatible with, and basically called for, under the goals of The Protocols. Schiff's role in those events was divulged only many years later. Schiff also helped fund President Woodrow Wilson's presidential campaign.
IOW, Jacob Schiff, the Wall Street jewish banker who secretly worked to implement the actions called for in The Protocols—when shown The Protocols—said they were a German forgery!
As for Brandeis, he was the first jew nominated to the Supreme Court—done so by Woodrow Wilson, the president who helped institute the Federal Reserve, got the US involved in The Great War, and who was critical in the creation of the League of Nations (along with his close advisor, the jewish financier Bernard Baruch)—again, all goals & achievements called for in The Protocols. Brandeis dismissed them with the now-all-too-familiar deflection, declaring them a product of Russian antisemitism (the holo caust wasn't yet available, I guess).
Don't forget Protocol 9: "We shall replace the laws with our own decrees, which will be interpreted by our own authorities." As Supreme Court Justice, that's exactly what Brandeis did, literally fulfilling The Protocols just a like Schiff did.
For those keeping score: 2 prominent jews directly involved in implementing various goals outlined in The Protocols at the highest levels both said they were forgeries—and their testimonies were classified and sealed for over 50 years. How Convenient!
What does that remind you of?Mike
Laatst bewerkt:
Mike
Mike
Laatst bewerkt:
Mike
Mike
Mike
Mike
Mike
Homicidal Pedophile-Rapist Leo Frank Proven Guilty at Trial to a Near Mathematical Certainty
Among the most arrogant and insulting strategies employed by ethnoreligious supremacists who seek to rehabilitate Leo Frank, a convicted child molesting murderer and sexual deviant, is the cynical and deliberate injection of religion into every stage of the historical record, from the trial itself, to the appeals, and even into the aftermath more than a century later. These pedophile apologists, intent on sanitizing his crimes, attempt to rewrite history by asserting that Frank’s conviction and eventual extrajudicial hanging were driven not by the abundant and damning evidence presented in court, but by irrational prejudice about his spiritual faith and religious bigotry. Such claims are not only demonstrably false, they are morally grotesque and repugnant.
Leo Frank’s Trial Evidence Left No Doubt: His Guilt Was Proven With Near Mathematical Certainty
The record of Frank’s trial and appeals to the state and federal supreme courts, demolishes the ADL’s revisionist narrative. He was represented by some of the most capable, competent, and expensive attorneys in the state of Georgia. His lead counsel, Luther Rosser, received a $15,000 retainer, which was an extraordinary sum at the time, while his co-counsel, Reuben Arnold, was paid $10,000. These were not mediocre or incompetent defenders; they were among the best legal minds available in the era, and they fought aggressively on Frank’s behalf.
The trial itself was painstaking, lasting weeks and involving dozens of witnesses and exhibits. Journalists meticulously recorded the direct and cross examinations during court proceedings, publishing them daily in their newspapers. The official trial record, known as the Leo Frank Brief of Evidence, survives in full. It has since been transcribed, converted into audiobooks, and produced as clipping videos, now published online and shared on X (formerly Twitter).
A Jury of His Peers
The twelve jurors, fair-minded men sworn under oath, were charged with the solemn duty of weighing this evidence. They were given the explicit legal option of recommending mercy if they believed it appropriate. Yet after careful deliberation, they unanimously found Leo Frank guilty beyond a reasonable doubt and recommended “no mercy.” The presiding judge then imposed the lawful sentence of death by hanging.
To suggest that this process was the product of blind hatred rather than the logical outcome of the evidence is an affront to the judicial system that gave Leo Frank the longest and most expensive trial in Southern history at the time, and to dismiss the memory of Mary Phagan, the innocent thirteen-year-old whose life was brutally taken after she was sexually assaulted by Leo Frank.
Georgia Governor John Slaton’s Financial Conflict of Interest
The outrage that culminated in Leo Frank’s lynching cannot be understood without recognizing the role of Georgia Governor John Slaton. Just days before leaving office, Slaton commuted Frank’s death sentence to life imprisonment, a move that enraged much of the Georgia public. This was not merely controversial because of its timing, but because of the glaring financial conflict of interest behind it.
Slaton was a law partner of Luther Rosser, Frank’s lead defense attorney, and part-owner of the very law firm representing Frank from trial to his state appeals. By commuting Frank’s sentence, Slaton acted in a way that directly benefited his own professional and financial interests, while overriding the unanimous jury verdict, the presiding judge’s death sentence, and the Georgia Supreme Court’s affirmation that the evidence sustained Frank’s guilt.
To many Georgians in 1915, this was not only a betrayal of justice but also proof that political corruption, money, and elite influence were being used to shield a wealthy, well-connected factory superintendent from lawful and appropriate punishment. The fury was directed not at Frank’s religion but at the Governor’s abuse of power and the miscarriage of justice it represented.
Frank’s Conviction Was Not Prejudice but Proof: His Guilt Demonstrated to Near Mathematical Certainty
The Georgia Supreme Court itself reviewed the trial record in detail and declared unequivocally that the evidence presented at trial fully sustained the jury’s verdict of guilt. To ignore this official ruling and reduce the case retroactively to nothing more than an episode of religious animus is to distort the truth beyond recognition and insult the intelligence of everyone who studies the legal files of the case. Such revisionism trivializes the trial's forensic evidence and testimony, insults the fair judicial process Frank received, and undermines the rule of law by replacing fact with anti-Gentile propaganda.
Leo Frank was not extrajudicially hanged because of differences in the way he worships the same God as Christians, but because of the ghoulish crime he committed against a young girl. To conflate his lynching with religious animus is a disgusting deflection, one that seeks to obscure the true cause of public outrage in 1915: Governor John Slaton’s betrayal of justice in commuting the sentence of a man lawfully convicted of murder. If the lynchers were actually antisemitic and Jew haters, they would not need to drive 16 hours round trip to milledgville, their were thousands of Jews living in Atlanta. The false accusations of antisemitism do not hold up to scrutiny.
The Vileness of Historical Falsification
There is something especially vile about those who knowingly falsify history in order to rehabilitate a man proven guilty of murdering a child. Sexual molestation of Mary Phagan was confirmed by the testimony of Dr. H.F. Harris, the physician who conducted her autopsy. To ignore this evidence and instead blame intolerance of one's religious faith is to commit a second injustice against the victim herself.
Frank’s defenders add insult to injury by weaponizing claims of Jew hatred and religious persecution where none existed, turning a clear case of justice into a fabricated morality tale. If there were true accountability, those who perpetuate these lies, who work tirelessly to whitewash the record of a homicidal pervert, would be exposed for what they are and treated with the same public scorn reserved for those who defend the indefensible.
It is becoming increasingly difficult to recognize the world we live in after the shocking events that recently unfolded in Nevada, coupled with the disturbing revelations still pouring out of the Epstein files. These cases shine a light on the depths of corruption, exploitation, and moral decay that infect powerful circles of society. To make matters worse, we now witness a parallel campaign of deceit as certain groups and individuals work tirelessly to rewrite history by attempting to rehabilitate Leo Frank, a convicted homicidal pedophile-rapist. This grotesque effort to disguise the brutality of his crime against a young girl by reframing him as a victim of prejudice is not only historically dishonest but profoundly offensive. Together, these examples reveal a pattern: a willingness by elites and their apologists to protect predators, to excuse the inexcusable, and to obscure justice for victims in order to preserve their own narratives of power and control.
Mike
Among the most arrogant and insulting strategies employed by ethnoreligious supremacists who seek to rehabilitate Leo Frank, a convicted child molesting murderer and sexual deviant, is the cynical and deliberate injection of religion into every stage of the historical record, from the trial itself, to the appeals, and even into the aftermath more than a century later. These pedophile apologists, intent on sanitizing his crimes, attempt to rewrite history by asserting that Frank’s conviction and eventual extrajudicial hanging were driven not by the abundant and damning evidence presented in court, but by irrational prejudice about his spiritual faith and religious bigotry. Such claims are not only demonstrably false, they are morally grotesque and repugnant.
Leo Frank’s Trial Evidence Left No Doubt: His Guilt Was Proven With Near Mathematical Certainty
The record of Frank’s trial and appeals to the state and federal supreme courts, demolishes the ADL’s revisionist narrative. He was represented by some of the most capable, competent, and expensive attorneys in the state of Georgia. His lead counsel, Luther Rosser, received a $15,000 retainer, which was an extraordinary sum at the time, while his co-counsel, Reuben Arnold, was paid $10,000. These were not mediocre or incompetent defenders; they were among the best legal minds available in the era, and they fought aggressively on Frank’s behalf.
The trial itself was painstaking, lasting weeks and involving dozens of witnesses and exhibits. Journalists meticulously recorded the direct and cross examinations during court proceedings, publishing them daily in their newspapers. The official trial record, known as the Leo Frank Brief of Evidence, survives in full. It has since been transcribed, converted into audiobooks, and produced as clipping videos, now published online and shared on X (formerly Twitter).
A Jury of His Peers
The twelve jurors, fair-minded men sworn under oath, were charged with the solemn duty of weighing this evidence. They were given the explicit legal option of recommending mercy if they believed it appropriate. Yet after careful deliberation, they unanimously found Leo Frank guilty beyond a reasonable doubt and recommended “no mercy.” The presiding judge then imposed the lawful sentence of death by hanging.
To suggest that this process was the product of blind hatred rather than the logical outcome of the evidence is an affront to the judicial system that gave Leo Frank the longest and most expensive trial in Southern history at the time, and to dismiss the memory of Mary Phagan, the innocent thirteen-year-old whose life was brutally taken after she was sexually assaulted by Leo Frank.
Georgia Governor John Slaton’s Financial Conflict of Interest
The outrage that culminated in Leo Frank’s lynching cannot be understood without recognizing the role of Georgia Governor John Slaton. Just days before leaving office, Slaton commuted Frank’s death sentence to life imprisonment, a move that enraged much of the Georgia public. This was not merely controversial because of its timing, but because of the glaring financial conflict of interest behind it.
Slaton was a law partner of Luther Rosser, Frank’s lead defense attorney, and part-owner of the very law firm representing Frank from trial to his state appeals. By commuting Frank’s sentence, Slaton acted in a way that directly benefited his own professional and financial interests, while overriding the unanimous jury verdict, the presiding judge’s death sentence, and the Georgia Supreme Court’s affirmation that the evidence sustained Frank’s guilt.
To many Georgians in 1915, this was not only a betrayal of justice but also proof that political corruption, money, and elite influence were being used to shield a wealthy, well-connected factory superintendent from lawful and appropriate punishment. The fury was directed not at Frank’s religion but at the Governor’s abuse of power and the miscarriage of justice it represented.
Frank’s Conviction Was Not Prejudice but Proof: His Guilt Demonstrated to Near Mathematical Certainty
The Georgia Supreme Court itself reviewed the trial record in detail and declared unequivocally that the evidence presented at trial fully sustained the jury’s verdict of guilt. To ignore this official ruling and reduce the case retroactively to nothing more than an episode of religious animus is to distort the truth beyond recognition and insult the intelligence of everyone who studies the legal files of the case. Such revisionism trivializes the trial's forensic evidence and testimony, insults the fair judicial process Frank received, and undermines the rule of law by replacing fact with anti-Gentile propaganda.
Leo Frank was not extrajudicially hanged because of differences in the way he worships the same God as Christians, but because of the ghoulish crime he committed against a young girl. To conflate his lynching with religious animus is a disgusting deflection, one that seeks to obscure the true cause of public outrage in 1915: Governor John Slaton’s betrayal of justice in commuting the sentence of a man lawfully convicted of murder. If the lynchers were actually antisemitic and Jew haters, they would not need to drive 16 hours round trip to milledgville, their were thousands of Jews living in Atlanta. The false accusations of antisemitism do not hold up to scrutiny.
The Vileness of Historical Falsification
There is something especially vile about those who knowingly falsify history in order to rehabilitate a man proven guilty of murdering a child. Sexual molestation of Mary Phagan was confirmed by the testimony of Dr. H.F. Harris, the physician who conducted her autopsy. To ignore this evidence and instead blame intolerance of one's religious faith is to commit a second injustice against the victim herself.
Frank’s defenders add insult to injury by weaponizing claims of Jew hatred and religious persecution where none existed, turning a clear case of justice into a fabricated morality tale. If there were true accountability, those who perpetuate these lies, who work tirelessly to whitewash the record of a homicidal pervert, would be exposed for what they are and treated with the same public scorn reserved for those who defend the indefensible.
It is becoming increasingly difficult to recognize the world we live in after the shocking events that recently unfolded in Nevada, coupled with the disturbing revelations still pouring out of the Epstein files. These cases shine a light on the depths of corruption, exploitation, and moral decay that infect powerful circles of society. To make matters worse, we now witness a parallel campaign of deceit as certain groups and individuals work tirelessly to rewrite history by attempting to rehabilitate Leo Frank, a convicted homicidal pedophile-rapist. This grotesque effort to disguise the brutality of his crime against a young girl by reframing him as a victim of prejudice is not only historically dishonest but profoundly offensive. Together, these examples reveal a pattern: a willingness by elites and their apologists to protect predators, to excuse the inexcusable, and to obscure justice for victims in order to preserve their own narratives of power and control.
Mike
Lievergezond
Well-known member
Forum statistieken
