Tucker Carlson

[fatsnotbad]

Sir Jacob Rees-Mogg explains how Britain, which has a combat ready military force about half the size of New York’s police department, must prepare for war with Russia.

0:00 What Is This War and Why Does Britain Need to Fight It?
19:40 Is There Majority Support for War With Russia?
25:02 Will We See a Nuclear Exchange?
26:18 Is Using Nuclear Weapons Accepted in Christianity?
33:15 Was WWII Good for Britain?
39:08 Is Ukraine a Sovereign Country?
47:29 Would Hitler Have Invaded Britain?
53:45 Britain's Attacks on Anti-War Voices
58:38 Is a War With Russia Worth the Lives of Britons?
1:03:07 What Has the British Government Done With Palestine Action?



Mike

 

[Medusa]

Sir Jacob Rees-Mogg legt uit hoe Groot-Brittannië, dat een gevechtsklare militaire macht heeft die ongeveer half zo groot is als de politieafdeling van New York, zich moet voorbereiden op oorlog met Rusland.

0:00 Wat Is Deze Oorlog en Waarom Moet Groot-Brittannië Vechten?
19:40 Is Er Meerderheidssteun voor Oorlog met Rusland?
25:02 Zullen We een Nucleaire Uitwisseling Zien?
26:18 Wordt het Gebruik van Nucleaire Wapens Geaccepteerd in het Christendom?
33:15 Was de Tweede Wereldoorlog Goed voor Groot-Brittannië?
39:08 Is Oekraïne een Soeverein Land?
47:29 Zou Hitler Groot-Brittannië Hebben Invalide?
53:45 Groot-Brittanniës Aanvallen op Anti-Oorlogse Stemmen
58:38 Is een Oorlog met Rusland de Levens van Britten Waard?
1:03:07 Wat Heeft de Britse Regering Gedaan met Palestine Action?

 

[fatsnotbad]

Tucker is so good at this. Here, he completely deconstructs this British politician’s entire theory of just war in under ten minutes. It quickly becomes transparent that the scaffolding upholding his entire moral justification for the nuking of Hiroshima and Nagasaki is just thought-terminating clichés, not a deep understanding of the tradition that begat ideas like “jus ad bellum” or “jus in bello” or something like that.

And this is why Tucker’s so popular. Compare these interviews with the ones he regularly gets from corporate press journalists. The difference in intellect is clear, but it also becomes obvious that, although traditional media pretends to care about speaking “truth to power,” on matters of war and peace, they are puppets for the regime. He's quite literally the only one with the same access who is doing it right.



Mike

 

[fatsnotbad]

Rees-Mogg Obliteration: "Tucker: If you're ready to send British troops off to die for the Sovereign territory of Ukraine, why don't you want it for the INVASION of your own country - Mogg: That's not a military but a civil matter"?

Rarely in politics will you see a 'patriotic' Quisling exposed with such ease and craftsmanship than that foisted upon the contemptuous @Jacob_Rees_Mogg, by American journalist @TuckerCarlson this week.

Mogg is truly a plutocrat who views the planned invasion of the UK by hundreds of thousands of unfettered fighting aged men as a mere 'civil matter'.

The former Rothschild war whore Mogg treats 300000 men entering in to the UK - essentially at the behest of his etonian Bumchum PM Boris, like a dispute over a fucking parking space.

In reality Rees-Mogg believes in serfdom, where the 'great unwashed' bow to the master, like good little peasants, while he counts the cash coming in and the bodies piling up as he watches from the comfort of his country pile.

Mogg is finished as a political option for the Tories. He's happy to go to war for the EU Empire expansion asset stripping of Ukraine while turning a pompous eye to watching the UK being destroyed.

With the likes of the upper class Quisling at the helm of any party, there are no hope of recapturing our 'National Sovereignty'.



Mike