Charlie Kirk

Yesterday, @TheGrayzoneNews released a leaked contract showing TPUSA's sponsorship deal with an Israeli govt-aligned org. So I followed the money. And
@AndrewKolvet has some explaining to do....

In May 2025, Charlie Kirk was in the worst fight of his life, and not with the left. It was with his own donors, over Israel. We know because his texts leaked and Turning Point confirmed they're real: "Just lost another huge Jewish donor. $2 million a year because we won't cancel Tucker. I cannot and will not be bullied."

That same month, May 16, someone at Turning Point signed a contract. First question I had, no way Charlie signed this. I was right, his name is nowhere on it.

The sponsor is the International Fellowship of Christians and Jews. They are an American charity, $318 million a year, milked mostly from elderly Christians watching TV, closely aligned with the Israeli government, and already renting space inside Fox, Daily Wire, Newsmax, Levin, and Cruz. They bought the boomer audience, so this contract is them buying our kids.

The deal: $700,000 with the first $300K due June 1, 2025, two weeks after signing.

RED FLAG 1: "Exclusivity Category: Jewish/Israel Nonprofit." That's rate-card language. You don't invent a category for one customer. Turning Point had an Israel lane FOR SALE, and this sponsor bought every seat in it through 2027. Interesting considering their mission, but moving on...

RED FLAG 2: "Israel Activism Kits" shipped to 200+ campuses with the sponsor holding "Creative Collaboration and Approval," plus a "Collaborative Campaign for week of October 7th." Every year through 2027. So, a youth charity sold a foreign-aligned sponsor approval rights over what its own student chapters hand out, and nobody handing it out was ever told. Okay.

RED FLAG 3: The last page: "everything in this agreement is confidential." Sponsors pay to be SEEN. You only hide the terms when the terms are the product. What did the NDA protect? The price, the category, the kits, the list access.

RED FLAG 4: The signatures. The sponsor sent its U.S. CEO. Turning Point's line reads "Strategic Partnerships," and a staffer one year out of college signed it. It's the same boilerplate they use for exhibitors, the one with a $100 fine for opening your booth late. A $700K influence deal moved through a $115 million organization on sponsor booth paper with no officer's name within a mile of it. Executives don't negotiate with coordinators. This looks like intentional routing and doesn't make sense.

Now the timeline, because it's brutal:

- June 1, 2025: the first $300K comes due
- July: Charlie puts Tucker on the main stage of the FIRST sponsored event anyway
- Aug 6, 2025: The same day the second sponsored event opens at Rancho Palos Verdes, Charlie goes on Megyn Kelly and says donors are telling him he's "no longer with us."
- Sept 6: his biggest pro-Israel donor pulls $2M a year at a private LA dinner
- Sept 8: Kirk asks for a "DOGE" like assessment
- Sept 10: Charlie Kirk is assassinated
- Five weeks later: the contract's October 7th campaign window arrives, under new leadership that inherited every obligation and canceled nothing

RED FLAG 5: The second $200K came due June 1, 2026. The exact stretch when Andrew Kolvet was insisting there was no "foreign" money and that TPUSA "cannot accept" it. He never "we don't have an Israel-aligned sponsor under NDA." He engineered that to be technically true while the Fellowship contract existed.

But, it makes sense considering before Turning Point, public filings list Kolvet as VP of Communications at The KAIROS Company, Rev. Johnnie Moore's PR shop, where Kolvet was the named media contact for the Jerusalem Prayer Team and Friends of Zion. Professional Christian Zionist messaging was his actual job. KAIROS distributed press for the Fellowship itself, and Moore's endorsement is on IFCJ's website right now. But yeah, keep talking, Andrew.

And is the sponsor's name in the new FY2025 990? Of course not, and that is intentional and why it took a leaked document.

Nothing here says anyone killed Charlie. What it says is that his own org was being sneaky about selling the exact thing he was publicly refusing to sell, right through the summer they buried him.

The real questions: who wrote clauses a first-year staffer never could? What else is still under NDA?

This is one small leaked contract, I'm guessing based on their financial patterns established over a decade of 990s, that this isn't the only one. And every lawsuit they keep threatening comes with discovery, and discovery opens the books, opens their communications, opens contracts, opens governance, and best of all...opens financials.



Mike
 
"Vandalism like this is not funny, it’s diabolical."

A statue and memorial honoring Charlie Kirk outside Turning Point USA's Phoenix headquarters are vandalized just three days after the statue was unveiled to mark one-year since his assassination.

Bright red paint is smeared across the eight-foot statue, while a memorial featuring Kirk's photo and a Christian message referencing Jesus is also defaced.

"They think spray paint can obscure his legacy, but it will only spread it further," Erika Kirk writes in response to the vandalism.

Turning Point USA says it will restore the statue and replace the signs while working with law enforcement to identify those responsible.





Mike
 
‼️BREAKING: Tyler Robinson’s Father Matt Says His Son NEVER Confessed — And The Alleged Texts Are NOT How He Talks

Matt Robinson just blew a hole in the official story. In messages now circulating, Tyler’s father says his son never confessed to him or to anyone else — and that the language in the alleged text and Discord “confession” is not how Tyler has ever spoken.

That is not a rumor mill take. That is the father on the record, in writing. He also says he is almost certain Tyler was at Cowboy’s steakhouse in Panguitch, Utah on September 10 — not running a rooftop hit — and that he still needs the proof pulled. The media and Turning Point have sold a tidy package: parents turned him in, the texts prove guilt, case closed. Matt is saying the opposite. No confession. Wrong voice. Wrong timeline.

He also explains why the family has been silent. He says he is under a court order not to speak about the case, and that talking could put him in contempt and possibly in jail. Then he asks for help fighting for his son anyway. That is not a father who “admits guilt by staying quiet.” That is a gag. If the evidence was overwhelming they would not need the dad locked down while proxies tell you what he believes.

The ball is in the state’s court. Release the raw messages with full metadata, or admit the confession narrative was sold before it was proven.



Mike
 
‼️Erika Kirk Just Posted NEW Vacation Pics To Her IG And I Have Questions Who Is The "MYSTERY MAN" With Her And WHY Is She Trying To Pass Someone Elses Kid Off As Gigi? 👀

On the anniversary of Charlie’s death, Candace sat down on her show and read the letters she has been writing to him in Heaven. People felt that because it was raw. It was ugly in the right way. It was a friend who is actually mourning him. Erika saw how that landed. Then she posts this family fishing clip with a caption written like a letter to Charlie. That is not grief. That is her watching what worked and running the same playbook.

She has already admitted she researched how widows grieve. She said there is no blueprint. She did not feel it. She had to study it. This post is no different. The comments clocked it immediately — cringe, staged, fake. A person who cannot feel it copies the person who can.

Now look at the video. That little girl on the deck in the pink Crocs, tie-dye hoodie, and baby fishing pole is not her daughter Gigi. Three weeks ago she posted Gigi at the Cubs–Diamondbacks game in the big 04 jersey, standing at the rail. Gigi is taller and older. So who is she hugging in this new clip? Who is she teaching to fish while she captions it like a letter to Charlie? Why pass someone else’s child off as her own? And who is the adult male in the white shirt sitting on that deck? This is supposed to be a private family trip. Who is close enough to be there with her and those kids? Who is holding the camera? Could that be Blake Wynn — the same guy she was caught with at the Beverly Hills Hotel — or another man she will not name?

Charlie answered his critics to their face with more speech. He brought them to the front of the line. Erika stays quiet in public and directs her proxies to attack anyone who simply notices.

If @MrsErikaKirk will not answer these three basic questions — why copy Candace’s letters, who is that mystery little girl, and who is the man she trusted enough to take on a private family vacation around her kids — she is proving the point for us. Night and day from the man she claims to be mourning.



Mike
 
Het hele beveiligingsteam van Charlie Kirk droeg dezelfde statisch-ontladende schoenen. Het type schoenen dat mensen dragen wanneer ze explosieven hanteren, of werken in munitiefabrieken, zodat elke statische elektriciteit die ze oppikken wordt afgevoerd naar de grond voordat het een vonk kan veroorzaken en een onverwachte explosie kan uitlokken.

Allemaal. WTF?

Misschien hebben ze allemaal van tevoren gecommuniceerd voor het evenement om hun outfits te coördineren en ervoor te zorgen dat ze niet botsten - maar ik betwijfel het.

Waarom zouden ze speciale schoenen voor het hanteren van explosieven nodig hebben?
 
🚨 IS SHELBY KOZAK A MOLE INSIDE TPUSA?

Hunter Kozak, the last person to ever ask Charlie a question, is a member of the un-f*ck America group whose tour followed Charlie Kirk’s events to counter and disrupt them.

I recently learned by reading a post by Project Constitution, Hunter’s wife, Shelby Kozak, was in the UVU crowd on 9/10. Eleven months later, Hunter Kozak admits it.

I knew I’d seen her face before. YUP! Shelby Kozak is a TPUSA member as seen in the attacked group photo!

So let’s put that together:

His wife is apparently connected to an organization whose beliefs don’t align with Hunter’s organization. AT ALL
Then Charlie Kirk is ass*ssinated at the very event where Hunter is asking him the final question.
Does Erika Kirk know?
Is Shelby Kozak a Mole Why weren’t Hunter and Shelby together?
Why wasn’t Hunter Kozak looking for her when the shot rang out?
Why did he wait 11 months to mention she was there? And what exactly was Shelby’s role with TPUSA?





Hunter Kozak asked Charlie Kirk the final question. His wife Shelby filmed him from the crowd.

All while their 3-day-old newborn was in the NICU following birth complications. 🤯

They chose to leave the hospital and attend that event that day.

🚨 Ask yourself: why was it so important for them to be there?





Mike
 

Forum statistieken

Onderwerpen
4.727
Berichten
640.696
Leden
8.713
Nieuwste lid
realrebbit02
Word vaste donateur van dit forum
Terug
Bovenaan