Charlie Kirk

‼️Nick Shirley CAUGHT Lying About Being In New York The Day Charlie Was ASSASSINATED — And It BLOWS UP Andrew Kolvet's Only Alibi 😱

Nick Shirley was NOT in New York City on September 10th. He was in Utah. A video he posted from the Orem train station that same day catches the ticket agent announcing the location over the PA system in the background — the audio places him minutes from where Charlie Kirk was shot. The next day, September 11th, he films himself at Salt Lake City International Airport, and the scenery outside the window matches public photos of that terminal exactly.

Two clips. Two days. Same state.

That single fact destroys the story he has repeated: that he had already gone back to New York, and that the segment he did with Andrew Kolvet on The Charlie Kirk Show that morning was live. If Nick was standing in Utah on the 10th and again on the 11th, the interview could not have been live. And if it was not live, the one real-time alibi Andrew Kolvet has ever offered for his own movements that morning evaporates.

It gets worse. Nick says Charlie texted him the night of the 9th inviting him onto the show on Thursday the 11th — and that he had originally planned to livestream the UVU event in person before "last-minute obligations" forced him to New York. But Charlie himself was scheduled to be at Charis Bible College in Colorado on the 11th. So why is Charlie trying to book Nick for an interview on a day Charlie already had somewhere else to be? And why does the screenshot Nick released show only a partial thread, cut off exactly where the useful part of the conversation would be?

Then there is the part almost nobody has clocked. In that September 10th train station video, Nick is already pushing the fed-slop line — radical leftists, Antifa, blame the left — before a single fact about the shooter or the motive was public. Not hours later. Not after a briefing. On the day, on camera, before the evidence existed.

Put it together and it stops looking like a coincidence. It looks like Nick Shirley was inserted into the Charlie Kirk timeline to sell the official story to Gen Z before anyone could check it, and to help manufacture an alibi for Andrew Kolvet while he was at it. That is not organic journalism. That is a jacketed asset doing precisely what it was placed there to do.

And here is your update: Nick Shirley says this is all false. So I asked him for the originals of the photos he claims debunk me, so the metadata could be verified. He refused.

He has the files. He has the timestamps. He will not hand them over. You tell me what that means.

Nick Shirley's public answer to all of this is that it's false. Fine. Good. That is exactly what a correction is for — so I went to him privately and asked for the one thing that settles it either way: the original uncompressed files, so the metadata could be checked by someone who actually knows what he's looking at.

Here is what happened.

He opened with confidence: "Yes 100% I filmed it at JFK before I went to the UK." I told him if it checks out, I will apologize and correct the record publicly. He replied, "Yes a correction deserves to be served."

So I asked for the files. Original, uncompressed, straight from the camera roll — WeTransfer, Dropbox, anything, to an email address. Nothing exotic. Just the files.

What came back was a screenshot of the Photos app. A screen recording of a video player. Four photos pasted into the chat. And one file preview captioned "John F. Kennedy International… September 11, 2025 9:39 PM."

Every one of those is a copy of a copy. Re-saved, re-compressed, stripped. A screenshot of a screenshot carries no camera metadata at all. It carries whatever the phone decided to write on the label — which is precisely the thing under dispute. So he has handed me the claim again, not the evidence for it.

And here is where his own defense starts to break. His version is now: "I had an office in NYC that I lived in at that time and was in NYC by Sept 7 and then left for the UK on the 12th." Except there is a clip of him at the Orem train station on the 10th, with the ticket agent calling out the location over the PA. So which is it — New York from the 7th, or Utah on the 10th? Both cannot be true without a same-day cross-country round trip that nobody has produced a boarding pass for.

Look at the airport clip he sent as proof. The label on the file says JFK, 9:39 PM on September 11th. The scenery outside that window is Salt Lake City. He is using a file tagged one airport to prove he was at the other.

He says the timeline is wrong. He has the originals. He will not send them. "A correction deserves to be served" — then serve it.

A screenshot is not metadata. A label is not a timestamp. And a guy who is this confident should not be this hard to get a file out of.

CC: @AndrewKolvet



Mike
 

Forum statistieken

Onderwerpen
4.740
Berichten
646.619
Leden
8.714
Nieuwste lid
Monica Hop
Word vaste donateur van dit forum
Terug
Bovenaan