Mike
Mike
Mike
Mike
Mike
Mike
Mike
Mike
Mike
muis
Well-known member
Amen.
Mike
Mike
David Johannes
Well-known member
Protestanten eren Maria ook niet alleen katholieken.
Mike
muis
Well-known member
Zoeklicht TV
De Bijbel zegt ons veel over en voor vandaag de dag. Het Zoeklicht wijst op de tekenen van de tijd. Dit heeft zijn weerslag op hoe we als christen leven. Een leven uit verwachting betekent niet alleen uitzien naar de Heere Jezus, maar ook een heilige levenswandel en een dringende oproep om je te...
youtube.com
Meerdere informatieve filmpjes
Mike
Orthodox is definitely more right than Catholic which was created by the Romans after Jesus died, but not long after their co-conspirators the Edomites took over Judah and created the Talmud.
Perhaps the Catholic church was created with the right intent at the time - but it now has full blown Satanists at the helm / just like Judaism and Islam
All these “religions” have intercession and use the “religion” to control man.
Tell me, why should one choose orthodoxy over just having a personal relationship with Jesus bypassing All human religious authority to get direct access as mentioned in John 4:21-24
Mike
Perhaps the Catholic church was created with the right intent at the time - but it now has full blown Satanists at the helm / just like Judaism and Islam
All these “religions” have intercession and use the “religion” to control man.
Tell me, why should one choose orthodoxy over just having a personal relationship with Jesus bypassing All human religious authority to get direct access as mentioned in John 4:21-24
Mike
Mike
Mike
Know what grinds my gears?
Folks that deny Christ or Christianity without ever having read the Bible. And to be clear - I’m speaking of those that step up on a soapbox denouncing Christianity
Now, to be even clearer - I believe the spiritual journey is our own. And I applaud anyone walking their path and finding their beliefs.
However …
How can you know something won’t resonate with you if you won’t even read the source material?
How can you label it a “myth” if you’ve never taken the time to read it and discern it?
There are plenty of folks I see completely dismiss all of it without reading it.
Tbh, I have far more respect for those who have read it, and then come to the conclusion it isn’t for them. It is the exact same thing I have done with many religions and their associated teachings.
How can you claim to be “enlightened” or seeking spiritual ascension if you refuse to read all the theological text that you can get your hands on?
The most common excuse is that “man wrote it so he could have altered it”. Neat story. Man wrote the Torah, too. And the Vedas. And the Buddhist Canons. Man wrote the Emerald Tablets, and The Law Of One - but you’ll believe those men’s words as opposed to the Bible - of which countless stories have been corroborated throughout history, btw.
According to them, the Bible is the only spiritual text in history that could have been altered.
Mmkay. Totally makes sense…
If one was altered by man in order to gain control over people, then all were altered by man in order to gain control over people.
Ego is the anesthesia that deadens the pain of ignorance...
Put it this way: Imagine dismissing the fact that election fraud exists without even looking at the evidence, because it is literally no different than people dismissing Christianity having never read the Good Book.
There is a reason 1/3 of the world’s population is Christian, and it isn’t because we are all “brainwashed” or “indoctrinated”. It’s because a fair number of us began reading the Bible and then realized it is the truth.
If you wanna dismiss it after reading it, then so be it. But what do you have to lose by reading it? Other than perhaps your pride after realizing that book is a lot more truthful than you ever gave it credit for.
/endrant
Mike
Folks that deny Christ or Christianity without ever having read the Bible. And to be clear - I’m speaking of those that step up on a soapbox denouncing Christianity
Now, to be even clearer - I believe the spiritual journey is our own. And I applaud anyone walking their path and finding their beliefs.
However …
How can you know something won’t resonate with you if you won’t even read the source material?
How can you label it a “myth” if you’ve never taken the time to read it and discern it?
There are plenty of folks I see completely dismiss all of it without reading it.
Tbh, I have far more respect for those who have read it, and then come to the conclusion it isn’t for them. It is the exact same thing I have done with many religions and their associated teachings.
How can you claim to be “enlightened” or seeking spiritual ascension if you refuse to read all the theological text that you can get your hands on?
The most common excuse is that “man wrote it so he could have altered it”. Neat story. Man wrote the Torah, too. And the Vedas. And the Buddhist Canons. Man wrote the Emerald Tablets, and The Law Of One - but you’ll believe those men’s words as opposed to the Bible - of which countless stories have been corroborated throughout history, btw.
According to them, the Bible is the only spiritual text in history that could have been altered.
Mmkay. Totally makes sense…
If one was altered by man in order to gain control over people, then all were altered by man in order to gain control over people.
Ego is the anesthesia that deadens the pain of ignorance...
Put it this way: Imagine dismissing the fact that election fraud exists without even looking at the evidence, because it is literally no different than people dismissing Christianity having never read the Good Book.
There is a reason 1/3 of the world’s population is Christian, and it isn’t because we are all “brainwashed” or “indoctrinated”. It’s because a fair number of us began reading the Bible and then realized it is the truth.
If you wanna dismiss it after reading it, then so be it. But what do you have to lose by reading it? Other than perhaps your pride after realizing that book is a lot more truthful than you ever gave it credit for.
/endrant
Mike
Forum statistieken
