Gezondheid
- Onderwerp starter joje
- Startdatum
Wisten jullie dat de Nederlandse Hartstichting een aftreksel is van de American Heart Association die in feite is opgericht door Procter en Gamble, waarna alle gezonde vetten als ‘ongezond’ werden aangemerkt en in plaats daarvan de producten van P&G zoals margarine werden aangemerkt als ‘gezond’, terwijl deze eigenlijk extreem slecht voor je zijn?
Nee, ik ook niet…
Mike
Nee, ik ook niet…
Mike
butterfly2023
Well-known member
JulianB
Well-known member
Frequenties hebben wel degelijk invloed. Ik ken dit product niet. Dagelijks maak ik gebruik van een PEMF mat (iMRS), daar lijkt het op het eerste gezicht sterk op.
Wat ik praktisch vind aan een mat is dat het je gehele lichaam behandelt, bij zo'n staaf ben je er toch wel druk mee lijkt me?
Who gave medical doctors authority in healthcare ?
Seriously, who?
1. Heart Disease: 695,547
2. Cancer: 613,929
3. Iatrogenic (Medical Errors, Excluding Chiropractic/Naturopathic): ~250,000
4. COVID-19: 186,552
5. Unintentional Injuries: 181,936
6. Stroke: ~150,000
7. Alzheimer’s Disease: ~120,000
8. Diabetes: ~100,000 … (continuing through top 50 causes, e.g., rank 50: Certain congenital malformations, ~1,000 deaths)
….
Less than all that :
• Rank ~70–80: Chiropractic-Related Deaths: ~10–26
• Comparable to causes like lightning strikes (~20 deaths, rank ~75) or cataclysmic storms (~15–25 deaths, rank ~78). Chiropractic deaths, at ~10–26, would likely rank in the 70s, as they are slightly more frequent than rare causes like legal execution (~18 deaths, rank ~76) but less than drowning in natural water (~50 deaths, rank ~65).
• Rank ~80–90: Naturopathic-Related Deaths: <10
• Comparable to extremely rare causes like rabies (~5–10 deaths, rank ~85) or venomous animal bites (~5–10, rank ~88). With <10 deaths, naturopathic deaths would rank in the 80s or 90s, near causes like accidental suffocation in bed (~5 deaths, rank ~90) or unspecified external causes (<10, rank ~92).
Mike
Seriously, who?
1. Heart Disease: 695,547
2. Cancer: 613,929
3. Iatrogenic (Medical Errors, Excluding Chiropractic/Naturopathic): ~250,000
4. COVID-19: 186,552
5. Unintentional Injuries: 181,936
6. Stroke: ~150,000
7. Alzheimer’s Disease: ~120,000
8. Diabetes: ~100,000 … (continuing through top 50 causes, e.g., rank 50: Certain congenital malformations, ~1,000 deaths)
….
Less than all that :
• Rank ~70–80: Chiropractic-Related Deaths: ~10–26
• Comparable to causes like lightning strikes (~20 deaths, rank ~75) or cataclysmic storms (~15–25 deaths, rank ~78). Chiropractic deaths, at ~10–26, would likely rank in the 70s, as they are slightly more frequent than rare causes like legal execution (~18 deaths, rank ~76) but less than drowning in natural water (~50 deaths, rank ~65).
• Rank ~80–90: Naturopathic-Related Deaths: <10
• Comparable to extremely rare causes like rabies (~5–10 deaths, rank ~85) or venomous animal bites (~5–10, rank ~88). With <10 deaths, naturopathic deaths would rank in the 80s or 90s, near causes like accidental suffocation in bed (~5 deaths, rank ~90) or unspecified external causes (<10, rank ~92).
Mike
Right idea , but if it doesn’t fully correct the atlas and axis, including unwinding all layers of misalignment beneath like a Rubik’s cube in reverse order, then it will inevitably return to its former state as this state is compensatory in nature, on purpose by the CNS for the purpose of keeping the brainstem open.
With what we do, There’s not a “technique” associated with this. It’s chiropractic.
We use a form of adjusting that is similar to toggle recoil and Blair , with our own spin
It’s the test and analysis , and translation that makes this the best - hands down. We use a built in reflex system located at the axis and atlas that does not lie about the body. And it’s 100% interexaminer reliable - meaning any doc proficient in the test can get the job done
Aside from zone and a few others, some traditional and others upper cervcial, All these other “techniques” use an image to tell you how a joint moves
Movement can’t be seen on an image so their best is just an educated guess - and really a shot in the dark for most people.
Ours is batting 1.000 at clearing the UC spine - with objective proof for its completion so easy to discern a 5 year old could do it
The understanding of layered misalignments is a concept every other form of chiropractic is unfamiliar with and ultimately why we will always succeed where they fail.
Mike
With what we do, There’s not a “technique” associated with this. It’s chiropractic.
We use a form of adjusting that is similar to toggle recoil and Blair , with our own spin
It’s the test and analysis , and translation that makes this the best - hands down. We use a built in reflex system located at the axis and atlas that does not lie about the body. And it’s 100% interexaminer reliable - meaning any doc proficient in the test can get the job done
Aside from zone and a few others, some traditional and others upper cervcial, All these other “techniques” use an image to tell you how a joint moves
Movement can’t be seen on an image so their best is just an educated guess - and really a shot in the dark for most people.
Ours is batting 1.000 at clearing the UC spine - with objective proof for its completion so easy to discern a 5 year old could do it
The understanding of layered misalignments is a concept every other form of chiropractic is unfamiliar with and ultimately why we will always succeed where they fail.
Mike
Mike
Forum statistieken
