Mike
Trump 2026
- Onderwerp starter fatsnotbad
- Startdatum
Mike
Mike
Ansar Allah (Houthi's) hebben nu controle over de Bab al-Mandab Straat in de Rode Zee, terwijl Iran de Straat van Hormuz beheerst. Dit betekent dat anti-westerse en anti-zionistische shiitische moslimstrijders nu complete controle hebben over alle olietransporten in het midden-oosten. Trump nam een gok en nam aan dat Saoedi-Arabie de Straat van al-Mandab zou kunnen verzekeren voor het westen en Israel, maar nu zijn beide straten in handen van het shiitische verzet. De olieprijs schiet omhoog en staat nu op 109 dollar per vat, maar dit kan maar zo klimmen naar 200 dollar per vat. Bedenk dat dit ook het internationale transport van kunstmest betreft, wat een wereldwijde hongersnood teweeg kan brengen. Dit allemaal zodat Trump oorlog kan voeren in het midden-oosten voor Israel.
Mike
Mike
Mike
Mike
Mike
Westerse bondgenoten halen hun goud uit Amerika uit angst dat Trump het goud steelt, waaronder ook NL.
Mike
Mike
Mike
Mike
Mike
Not only is Kabbalah Don pathetically BRIBING what is left of MAGA and apparently “every adult in America” with $5,000, IF AND ONLY IF the Republicans win the House and Senate, which will likely never happen (remember the 2,000 DOGE checks)
But, did you know that MAGA is also now officially socialist?
That’s right.
This is
SOCIALISM.
Mike
But, did you know that MAGA is also now officially socialist?
That’s right.
This is
SOCIALISM.Mike
Mike
Mike
Mike
Mike
Mike
Mike
Mike
Trump was asked by a reporter about his previous promise to send Americans tariff refund checksQ: “You also offered tariff refund checks…”
TRUMP: “Not you. Not you.”
Q: “And that didn't happen…”
TRUMP: “Not you. You're the worst.”
Hey, no worries...
The refund checks are probably still stuck at USPS.
Mike
Ingraham: "Why not just give the $5,000 to people now? If you have it, why not just give it now?"
Trump: "Because the Democrats can’t do it. Because with them, it’s negative growth. We’re taking in $21 trillion because of tariffs.
Okay. I'm gonna go to town on this.
1. The Revenue Contradiction
Trump claims the U.S. is "taking in $21 trillion because of tariffs" and implies the money is already there ("If you have it..."). However, if the government already possesses or is actively collecting these trillions in revenue, congressional Democrats cannot stop the money from existing.His argument shifts from a claim of absolute fiscal abundance ("We are taking it in") to a claim of political gridlock ("The Democrats can't do it"), failing to explain how a political opponent can block funds that he claims have already been successfully raised.
2. Radical Mathematical Impossibliity
The claim of $21 trillion in tariff revenue is structurally impossible under current or projected economic conditions:The Reality: Total U.S. tariff revenue for Fiscal Year 2025 was $195 billion.The Gap: $21 trillion is more than 100 times the annual tariff revenue. It is also roughly equivalent to the entire annual Gross Domestic Product (GDP) of the United States. No combination of import tariffs could generate $21 trillion in a short timeframe, as global trade volumes are not large enough to sustain such taxation.
3. The Congressional Power Conflict
Trump blames Democrats for the inability to distribute the $5,000 checks immediately. However, under the U.S. Constitution, Congress holds the "power of the purse."If the executive branch has the funds, it still cannot legally distribute them without a congressional appropriation bill. By making the money conditional on the outcome of an election (retaining Republican majorities), Trump's answer inadvertently admits that the policy is a legislative proposal for the future, completely undermining his assertion that the money is already "taken in" and ready.
4. Economic Fallacy of "Negative Growth"
Trump states that with Democrats, "it's negative growth," implying that economic contraction is the reason the money cannot be given out now. However, if tariff revenues are already locked at $21 trillion, domestic economic growth rates would not retroactively erase federal funds that have already been collected. The two concepts are fiscally disconnected.
Translation: Everything this man says, EVERY FUCKING WORD THAT COMES OUT OF HIS MOUTH, IS A LIE.
Mike
Trump: "Because the Democrats can’t do it. Because with them, it’s negative growth. We’re taking in $21 trillion because of tariffs.
Okay. I'm gonna go to town on this.
1. The Revenue Contradiction
Trump claims the U.S. is "taking in $21 trillion because of tariffs" and implies the money is already there ("If you have it..."). However, if the government already possesses or is actively collecting these trillions in revenue, congressional Democrats cannot stop the money from existing.His argument shifts from a claim of absolute fiscal abundance ("We are taking it in") to a claim of political gridlock ("The Democrats can't do it"), failing to explain how a political opponent can block funds that he claims have already been successfully raised.
2. Radical Mathematical Impossibliity
The claim of $21 trillion in tariff revenue is structurally impossible under current or projected economic conditions:The Reality: Total U.S. tariff revenue for Fiscal Year 2025 was $195 billion.The Gap: $21 trillion is more than 100 times the annual tariff revenue. It is also roughly equivalent to the entire annual Gross Domestic Product (GDP) of the United States. No combination of import tariffs could generate $21 trillion in a short timeframe, as global trade volumes are not large enough to sustain such taxation.
3. The Congressional Power Conflict
Trump blames Democrats for the inability to distribute the $5,000 checks immediately. However, under the U.S. Constitution, Congress holds the "power of the purse."If the executive branch has the funds, it still cannot legally distribute them without a congressional appropriation bill. By making the money conditional on the outcome of an election (retaining Republican majorities), Trump's answer inadvertently admits that the policy is a legislative proposal for the future, completely undermining his assertion that the money is already "taken in" and ready.
4. Economic Fallacy of "Negative Growth"
Trump states that with Democrats, "it's negative growth," implying that economic contraction is the reason the money cannot be given out now. However, if tariff revenues are already locked at $21 trillion, domestic economic growth rates would not retroactively erase federal funds that have already been collected. The two concepts are fiscally disconnected.
Translation: Everything this man says, EVERY FUCKING WORD THAT COMES OUT OF HIS MOUTH, IS A LIE.
Mike
Forum statistieken
