Mike
ICE
- Onderwerp starter Colloquial
- Startdatum
Mike
Mike
Mike
Mike
A surveillance regime is being assembled in front of our very eyes.
Most of you do not understand the tyrannical nightmare directly ahead.
People still talk like this is a future problem. It's not. The battle against dystopia is now. 1984 is here.
It arrives as "efficiency," procurement, integrations, device adoption, and a slow widening of what the state can do to you without asking, without noticing you, without needing you to consent.
The attached video shows a federal agent in tactical gear wearing Meta Ray-Ban smart glasses on his face while carrying out state work. A camera at eye level. A microphone. A network connection. Constant recording that becomes a file, then a feed, then a searchable object that can be attached to a case, cross-referenced, stored, shared, and re-used.
Raw footage is noise until it can be fused, searched, and operationalized. That is where AI enters. ICE is paying Palantir to build "ImmigrationOS," described as a platform for near real-time visibility into enforcement workflows, including tracking people and helping decide who gets targeted.
Immigration is a perfect testing ground because the public has been trained to tolerate exceptional measures when the target group is already politically disposable. The capability does not stay there. It never stays there.
The nightmare is the stack itself. Capture at the edge, aggregation in the middle, AI scoring and targeting at the top. Doorbell cameras feed the state. License plate readers feed the state. Data brokers feed the state. Local sharing agreements feed the state. Wearables feed the state. AI compresses the labor cost of suspicion, so the state can watch more people, more often, with less human effort.
That is the mechanical shift most people still do not understand. AI does not need to be sentient to be oppressive. It needs to be cheap enough to scale the state’s attention and fast enough to outrun your ability to contest what it thinks it knows.
Let me paint you the picture: an agent walks up the block wearing smart glasses, and your face, your voice, your license plate, and the people you are standing with get captured immediately. That clip hits an internal system where AI transcribes, tags, and links it to whatever identifiers already exist, your name, your address, your contacts, your past crossings, your employer, your car, your social graph. The platform fuses that with location trails and camera networks, then assigns a "priority" score that quietly moves you up a queue nobody outside the system can see. A caseworker opens a dashboard and clicks through prebuilt options that generate a task list, knock, detain, transfer, pressure, repeat, with the paperwork already half-written by AI.
This is tyranny by procedure. The real chokehold is anticipatory control. Once people know they can be indexed, scored, and surfaced for enforcement, they start trimming their speech, their associations, their routes, their friends. Dissent becomes a risk factor, organizing becomes exposure, and the state does not need to ban protest when it can make participation costly enough to thin the crowd.
It inevitably expands to include anyone who interrupts the smooth operation of power, and this kind of surveillance gives power the ability to punish quietly, repeatedly, and selectively, with plausible deniability stapled to every click.
This is the formula for tyranny. The state gains capability, then finds incentives to justify using it. Agencies protect budgets by "demonstrating output." Contractors protect revenue by "delivering results." Politicians protect narratives by demanding visible "enforcement." Restraint gets treated as "inefficiency." Efficiency gets treated as "virtue." Your rights get treated as "friction."
Any system that allows institutions to assemble your biography without your consent, then act on it without due process, is an engine of domination. Some people tolerate it because they think they will never be the target. That belief is childish.
Power does not remain polite. It expands to fill the permissions you give it. A surveillance regime always needs new enemies to justify itself, because a machine built for pursuit must pursue.
The regime being assembled is not subtle, it is simply normalized. It runs on boredom, exhaustion, and the assumption that someone else will handle it.
It's all being wired now, and once it is wired, it will not ask your permission to be used.
Mike
Most of you do not understand the tyrannical nightmare directly ahead.
People still talk like this is a future problem. It's not. The battle against dystopia is now. 1984 is here.
It arrives as "efficiency," procurement, integrations, device adoption, and a slow widening of what the state can do to you without asking, without noticing you, without needing you to consent.
The attached video shows a federal agent in tactical gear wearing Meta Ray-Ban smart glasses on his face while carrying out state work. A camera at eye level. A microphone. A network connection. Constant recording that becomes a file, then a feed, then a searchable object that can be attached to a case, cross-referenced, stored, shared, and re-used.
Raw footage is noise until it can be fused, searched, and operationalized. That is where AI enters. ICE is paying Palantir to build "ImmigrationOS," described as a platform for near real-time visibility into enforcement workflows, including tracking people and helping decide who gets targeted.
Immigration is a perfect testing ground because the public has been trained to tolerate exceptional measures when the target group is already politically disposable. The capability does not stay there. It never stays there.
The nightmare is the stack itself. Capture at the edge, aggregation in the middle, AI scoring and targeting at the top. Doorbell cameras feed the state. License plate readers feed the state. Data brokers feed the state. Local sharing agreements feed the state. Wearables feed the state. AI compresses the labor cost of suspicion, so the state can watch more people, more often, with less human effort.
That is the mechanical shift most people still do not understand. AI does not need to be sentient to be oppressive. It needs to be cheap enough to scale the state’s attention and fast enough to outrun your ability to contest what it thinks it knows.
Let me paint you the picture: an agent walks up the block wearing smart glasses, and your face, your voice, your license plate, and the people you are standing with get captured immediately. That clip hits an internal system where AI transcribes, tags, and links it to whatever identifiers already exist, your name, your address, your contacts, your past crossings, your employer, your car, your social graph. The platform fuses that with location trails and camera networks, then assigns a "priority" score that quietly moves you up a queue nobody outside the system can see. A caseworker opens a dashboard and clicks through prebuilt options that generate a task list, knock, detain, transfer, pressure, repeat, with the paperwork already half-written by AI.
This is tyranny by procedure. The real chokehold is anticipatory control. Once people know they can be indexed, scored, and surfaced for enforcement, they start trimming their speech, their associations, their routes, their friends. Dissent becomes a risk factor, organizing becomes exposure, and the state does not need to ban protest when it can make participation costly enough to thin the crowd.
It inevitably expands to include anyone who interrupts the smooth operation of power, and this kind of surveillance gives power the ability to punish quietly, repeatedly, and selectively, with plausible deniability stapled to every click.
This is the formula for tyranny. The state gains capability, then finds incentives to justify using it. Agencies protect budgets by "demonstrating output." Contractors protect revenue by "delivering results." Politicians protect narratives by demanding visible "enforcement." Restraint gets treated as "inefficiency." Efficiency gets treated as "virtue." Your rights get treated as "friction."
Any system that allows institutions to assemble your biography without your consent, then act on it without due process, is an engine of domination. Some people tolerate it because they think they will never be the target. That belief is childish.
Power does not remain polite. It expands to fill the permissions you give it. A surveillance regime always needs new enemies to justify itself, because a machine built for pursuit must pursue.
The regime being assembled is not subtle, it is simply normalized. It runs on boredom, exhaustion, and the assumption that someone else will handle it.
It's all being wired now, and once it is wired, it will not ask your permission to be used.
Mike
Mike
Mike
Chaos bij ICE!
Mike
Mike
Mike
Mike
Mike
Mike
BREAKING: ICE now appears to be using the LRAD (long range acoustic device) weapon at close range against peaceful protesters in Minneapolis.
People exposed, especially at close range often suffer from:
•permanent hearing loss
•tinnitus (constant ringing)
•ruptured eardrums
•vertigo & balance problems
•migraines & nausea
•panic responses
Mike
People exposed, especially at close range often suffer from:
•permanent hearing loss
•tinnitus (constant ringing)
•ruptured eardrums
•vertigo & balance problems
•migraines & nausea
•panic responses
Mike
ICE toch niet teruggetrokken uit Minneapolis en St Paul?
Mike
Mike
Mike
ICE AGENTS TRIED TO ENTER ECUADORIAN CONSULATE, GOT TURNED AWAY AT THE DOORStaffer ran to block them: "This is the Ecuadorian consulate.
You're not allowed to enter."
One agent threatened to "grab" him before backing off.
Ecuador filed a formal protest.
International law says consulates are off-limits without permission.
Source: AP / @AZ_Intel_
Mike
Mike
Mike
Je kunt ze maar het beste uitlachen.
Mike
Laatst bewerkt:
Mike
Forum statistieken
