Mike
Andrew Wilson
- Onderwerp starter fatsnotbad
- Startdatum
Mike
Mike
WHO WAS FEEDING ANDREW WILSON INFORMATION FROM INSIDE UVU?On September 12, 2025, Andrew Wilson told Bryan Atlas on the Whatever podcast that someone “on the ground” at UVU told him Erika and Charlie’s daughter GG were there when Charlie was killed.
Andrew claimed GG witnessed her father’s murder, tried to run to him, was stopped by security, and cried: “Why can’t I get to Daddy?”
There’s a massive problem: this story has been repeatedly debunked.
Why hasn’t Andrew corrected the record or at least explained himself?
Not to mention Andrew got basic family details wrong.
He calls GG Charlie’s “youngest daughter.”
Charlie had ONE daughter. GG was his oldest child, approximately 3½ at the time. His son Mac, his youngest child. was 1½ at the time.
I want answers, We deserve answer:
WHO was Andrew’s source “on the ground” at UVU?
Who did Andrew supposedly confirm this story with?
In this SAME September 12 interview, Andrew also claimed a police officer at UVU sent him a video of Charlie’s assassination. A clip the public has never seen - a video Andrew says he personally received.
That makes TWO extraordinary claims involving people supposedly on the ground at UVU feeding Andrew information or material immediately after Charlie’s assassination.
Who were these people?
Andrew says he confirmed it.
Then name the source and explain the connection.
@RealCandaceO @baroncoleman @ZachCostello_ @iamcoachcolin
THIS NEEDS ANSWERS.On September 12, 2025 — just two days after Charlie Kirk was assassinated at UVU — Andrew Wilson said on the Whatever podcast that a POLICE OFFICER AT UVU sent him a video of Charlie Kirk being assassinated.
So I have some very simple questions:
WHO was this police officer?
WHAT exact video did they send Andrew?
WHY was an officer at UVU sending this footage directly to Andrew Wilson?
HOW did Andrew know this officer?
WHY did Andrew apparently receive this video before the public?
And WHERE is this video now?
If Andrew still has it, RELEASE THE VIDEO.
If this happened exactly as Andrew described it, he should explain who sent it, how he knew this officer, why it was sent directly to him, and what happened to the footage.
WATCH ANDREW SAY IT HIMSELF.
The public deserves answers.
Mike
Mike
Mike
Andrew Wilson aka @paleochristcon, LIED to the American people about Charlie's text messages. By using a classic "bait & switch" technique, he was able to use the Israeli tactic that they are using against Tyler Robinson right now.
Andrew Wilson thinks that someone "TAKING A PICTURE OF A CELL PHONE" with messages on them constitutes as an "evidence release".This is the same "mistake" that Tyler Robinson's defense team did NOT attack during the preliminary trials.
Why would you ALLOW the police take pictures of ONE OUT OF FIVE of Lance Twiggs cell phones, and then use that unverifiable data as evidence to convict a man for the death penalty? It's absolute lunacy, and none of the larger accounts are actually talking to you about this!!
I'm literally stuck breaking down BOTH bullet hole entries & exits from both shots that impacted Charlie's body at the same time by myself, and now, also all of the fake inconsistencies that do not constitute a REAL TRIAL.
You would think me finding the infrared beam on the back of Charlie Kirk's head would have been on the front page of the New York Times by now, but not a single peep from the largest accounts in independent media, nor the mainstream.
So, that's how I knew that no one is was going to point out how Andrew got these messages.
THEY ARE PICTURES TAKEN OF A CELL PHONE, AND "THEN" SENT TO ANDREW...
It isn't even about the chain of custody, but it is purely about the methodology.
The methodology to collect the data is so flawed and unverifiable that it is impossible to suggest that this is VERIFIED evidence.This type of evidence should have never been accepted at the preliminary trial, due to the ability of faking text messages with ease in today's world.
The only data that should have been presented is verified data that includes an independent analysis of the data from the actual phone itself, coupled with any verifiable data from the carrier. If this data is NOT presented, the so-called evidence is not verifiable, and therefore has no business being considered as real or convincing.READ THAT AGAIN.
I am giving you the blueprint to how these people are trying to create the "history" they want future generations to believe by lying in the present.
These "small details" are absolutely massive when we look back at this story later on.
Besides, I'm the guy who discovered the ALTERED FOOTAGE that Terryl Farnsworth gave to CO on episode 311 of the Candace Show.When you turn his footage into negative lighting, you can clearly see the infrared beam reflection moving on the back of Charlie Kirk's head at the time of his assassination.
You can see the impact of the round hitting his head in the parietal lobe region, before the necklace even raises up.
This is confirmed by the blood spatter coming out of his head, which can be seen in negative lighting, and it is confirmed by Cub Keller's high definition 60 frames per second video of the right rear portion of Charlie Kirk's head.
Two independent videos picking up the same infrared beam reflection on the right rear of Charlie Kirk's head is what we call EVIDENCE.That's what I bring to the table.
I'm willing to debate Andrew Wilson or anyone else on this topic, anywhere in the world.
Since 2025, I have been showing people the Birds of Prey drone technology that was deployed from the US Army spy plane equipped with launched effects capabilities.
Many people don't know that John Cullen, who has had a longer standing position that the Elbit Lanius drone assassinated Charlie Kirk, actually stole the Birds of Prey drone information from my Charlie Kirk: Operation 322 series.I'll be officially correcting the record in CKO322 PART VI.
Anyway, if you want to see the two shots that impacted Charlie Kirk's body at the same time, neither of them coming from Tyler Robinson, then the CKO322 series is for you.
It's everything that Andrew, TPUSA, Erika Kirk, and Israel REFUSES to tell you about.
BUSTED: Erika Kirk's Andrew Wilson might as well be the next Gary Meltdown, aka Paramount Not-So-Tactical, in the way that he is getting her in trouble!! To start, the resolution on the photo that Andrew gave us is intentionally blurred to hide or skew the lines of editing. This is a SLOPPY amateurish tactic. That's why when you turn this photo into NEGATIVE LIGHTING, you can see how messy this hack job really is!I'll give you one more bonus to prove this photo is 100% fake...
BONUS: This photo would have been taken directly from Charlie's cell phone, and nowhere else.
His messages are to the right, and the responses are from the left.
This would be someone who has first-hand access to his phone.
The only person that would have been is Erika Kirk...
By releasing this, Andrew Wilson is DIRECTLY implicating Erika Kirk in TAMPERING WITH AN ONGOING MURDER TRIAL, in which she has partial influence over!! Do you understand how huge this is to prove this text message is actually fake, and BEING USED TO SWAY PUBLIC OPINION AND ANY POTENTIAL JURY?This is what EVIL looks like...
As Andrew Wilson goes through his humiliation ritual at the hands of TPUSA, just for the purposes of having "access", let's not lose focus on who actually runs TPUSA...
Erika Kirk is DIRECTLY responsible for responding to this now... Either she directly gave these messages to Andrew herself, or she directly gave these messages to someone in TPUSA to give to Andrew herself.
Either way, Erika Kirk is responsible for these text messages, according to Andrew Wilson... There is NO OTHER WAY they could have been obtained through Charlie's personal cell phone.
If Erika is NOT willing to claim responsibility, then she is going to have to tell us exactly who had access to Charlie Kirk's cell phone besides her. What are your thoughts?
Is Erika Kirk influencing and tampering with an ongoing trial?!
Or, is all of this just "normal"?
My last thought...
It's 2026, and almost every cell phone in the United States has a decent camera on it.
They want us to believe that we keep getting blurry photos from their side because the cameras are not good...
How long are we going to continue to fall for the same tactic?
They want you to believe, that as millionaires, they don't have access to good cell phones with great cameras.
They want you to believe that the cameras at UVU were worse than the cameras at Dairy Queen.
And they don't even want you to think about the camera that was to the right of Charlie way up high on the side of the building; which could have coincidentally spotted the Birds of Prey drone that shot Charlie Kirk in the back of the head.
I've been telling you about the Birds of Prey drone that assassinated Charlie Kirk since 2025, all in my five-part 8 hour series entitled Charlie Kirk; Operation 322.
And recently I discovered the largest discovery of the Charlie Kirk assassination...
I discovered the infrared beam reflection on the back of Charlie Kirk's head at the time of his assassination, and the subsequent hole thereafter; leaving the neck as the EXIT.That creates a scientific impossibility for Tyler Robinson to have shot Charlie Kirk.
Autopsy findings support my analysis.
Physical evidence supports my analysis.
No one will debunk my analysis, but they simply won't tell you about it, regardless of how many viral videos I make...I am the most feared independent investigator of the Charlie Kirk assassination.
They won't debate me.
They never confront me.
They won't engage with me intellectually.
They won't even mention that they know I exist.
They'll comment on my work if someone shares it in their comment section.
But they won't comment directly to me.So, I'll leave you with this...
Do your research on EVERYTHING that these people say or present!
Watch what they do and who they affiliate themselves with.
They're definitely watching us.
Watch them back...
Mike
Mike
Mike
Mike
Mike
Mike
PBD claiming Andrew Wilson "won" because people know who he is now is peak podcaster rot.As @LionelMedia rightly points out: What’s the prize of getting famous if all you did was prove to millions of people that you’re complete trash?
Congratulations to Andrew Wilson for becoming household-name garbage.
Mike
Mike
Andrew Wilson’s debate style in a nutshell:
“GIVE ME YOUR REASONINGS”
*People respond reasonably and list things to answer him*
He then either screams over them or dismisses them by burping, farting, chugging a beer, saying some sort of generalized smear or something gross like he’s going to go hump his wife.
His whole schtick is to make 14 year old boys laugh, not to seek truth.
His debate style emulates Homer Simpson and not Charlie Kirk. This is really who we want to be leading American youth?
Mike
“GIVE ME YOUR REASONINGS”
*People respond reasonably and list things to answer him*
He then either screams over them or dismisses them by burping, farting, chugging a beer, saying some sort of generalized smear or something gross like he’s going to go hump his wife.
His whole schtick is to make 14 year old boys laugh, not to seek truth.
His debate style emulates Homer Simpson and not Charlie Kirk. This is really who we want to be leading American youth?
Mike
Mike
Mike
DO INCONCISTENCIES IN THE TELEGRAM MESSAGES REVEALED BY ANDREW WILSON INDICATE SUBTERFUGE? @RealCandaceO @baroncoleman
There is something questionable going on with the alleged Charlie Kirk Telegram messages revealed by Andrew Wilson.
DUAL TELEGRAM ACCOUNTS
"Pro-israel Cause": Sent 9/9/25
In the group chat below on the left, we discover that Charlie's Telegram account was named 'Charlie Kirk,' and his profile icon was 'CK.'
'The left': Also sent 9/9/25
From the alleged Telegram messages revealed by Andrew Wilson seen below on the right, Charlie seemed to be using a different Telegram account named '
' and its profile icon was also a '.'
This immediately raises several questions:
Is the '' account actually Charlie's account?
Why is it anonymous?
If Charlie had multiple Telegram accounts, why?
Did he have more than two accounts?
Were all his Telegram accounts actually run by him? For example, it's now widely known that Andrew Kolvet did most of Charlie's tweeting. Who ran Charlie's '' Telegram account? Was it even Charlie who sent that message about 'the left?' If Charlie didn't send that message, who did?
TPUSA must answer these questions with full context & transparency if it wants us to even BE ABLE take these new messages seriously.
Mike
There is something questionable going on with the alleged Charlie Kirk Telegram messages revealed by Andrew Wilson.
DUAL TELEGRAM ACCOUNTS
"Pro-israel Cause": Sent 9/9/25In the group chat below on the left, we discover that Charlie's Telegram account was named 'Charlie Kirk,' and his profile icon was 'CK.'
'The left': Also sent 9/9/25From the alleged Telegram messages revealed by Andrew Wilson seen below on the right, Charlie seemed to be using a different Telegram account named '
' and its profile icon was also a '.' This immediately raises several questions:
Is the '' account actually Charlie's account? Why is it anonymous?If Charlie had multiple Telegram accounts, why? Did he have more than two accounts?Were all his Telegram accounts actually run by him? For example, it's now widely known that Andrew Kolvet did most of Charlie's tweeting. Who ran Charlie's '' Telegram account? Was it even Charlie who sent that message about 'the left?' If Charlie didn't send that message, who did?TPUSA must answer these questions with full context & transparency if it wants us to even BE ABLE take these new messages seriously.
Mike
Mike
Andrew Wilson introduced me to the concept of “75% airtight.”
I’ve been examining how this standard performs in other fields.
SURGEON
75% certain this is the correct kidney.
There are, after all, only two.
FENCE
Completely surrounds the property.
Apart from the section where it doesn’t.
SUBMARINE
Three walls are completely watertight.
The fourth is open to the Atlantic.
ERIKA KIRK DATING HISTORY
Single for five years.
Except for the 25% spent in relationships.
ALIBI
Accounts for your whereabouts all night.
Except for the two hours when the murder happened.
BANK VAULT
Three walls are reinforced steel.
The fourth has been removed for ventilation.
PARACHUTE
Opens successfully on three out of four jumps.
The fourth is more of a learning experience.
SWIMMING POOL
Beautifully constructed and completely watertight.
Except for the drain-sized hole in the bottom that nobody bothered to plug.
WEDDING VOWS
Completely faithful.
Except for the affairs.
BULLETPROOF VEST
Stops three out of four bullets.
Statistically, you’re mostly bulletproof.
FRONT DOOR
Locked, bolted and fitted with a state-of-the-art security system.
The window next to it is wide open.
GPS
Gets you within 25 miles of your destination.
At that point, you’re basically there.
BRIDGE
Reaches 75% of the way across the canyon.
The remaining distance is technically quite small compared with the entire bridge.
CONDOM
Works perfectly in three out of four encounters.
The fourth is called a gender reveal party.
MURDER CASE
75% convinced the defendant did it.
25% unconvinced. Still demand the death penalty.
And unlike everything above, this one isn’t hypothetical…
#AndrewWilson #TylerRobinson #CandaceOwens
Mike
I’ve been examining how this standard performs in other fields.
SURGEON
75% certain this is the correct kidney.
There are, after all, only two.
FENCE
Completely surrounds the property.
Apart from the section where it doesn’t.
SUBMARINE
Three walls are completely watertight.
The fourth is open to the Atlantic.
ERIKA KIRK DATING HISTORY
Single for five years.
Except for the 25% spent in relationships.
ALIBI
Accounts for your whereabouts all night.
Except for the two hours when the murder happened.
BANK VAULT
Three walls are reinforced steel.
The fourth has been removed for ventilation.
PARACHUTE
Opens successfully on three out of four jumps.
The fourth is more of a learning experience.
SWIMMING POOL
Beautifully constructed and completely watertight.
Except for the drain-sized hole in the bottom that nobody bothered to plug.
WEDDING VOWS
Completely faithful.
Except for the affairs.
BULLETPROOF VEST
Stops three out of four bullets.
Statistically, you’re mostly bulletproof.
FRONT DOOR
Locked, bolted and fitted with a state-of-the-art security system.
The window next to it is wide open.
GPS
Gets you within 25 miles of your destination.
At that point, you’re basically there.
BRIDGE
Reaches 75% of the way across the canyon.
The remaining distance is technically quite small compared with the entire bridge.
CONDOM
Works perfectly in three out of four encounters.
The fourth is called a gender reveal party.
MURDER CASE
75% convinced the defendant did it.
25% unconvinced. Still demand the death penalty.
And unlike everything above, this one isn’t hypothetical…
#AndrewWilson #TylerRobinson #CandaceOwens
Mike
No F-ing way that Andrew Wilson showed up to the debate with Steven Crowders team & did a live call from her CHILDRENS PLAYROOM so that Steven Crowder can get clicks….
How immature & deranged do you have to be to pull some shit like that ?
That’s truly despicable & Andrew Wilson is the biggest cuck on earth.
Mike
How immature & deranged do you have to be to pull some shit like that ?
That’s truly despicable & Andrew Wilson is the biggest cuck on earth.
Mike
Forum statistieken
