Andrew Wilson

One thing that stuck out to me was the level of detail Candace Owens knows about the Charlie Kirk case. She knows the names, charges, testimony, places, etc.

You might not agree with her, but she proved she really cares about the case and finding the truth, in my opinion.

What Andrew Wilson proved to me is that he just cares to insert himself into a hot topic of our time. Said he didn’t care much for Charlie Kirk when he was alive, or TPUSA. Didn’t know the charges, etc.

A lot of people took Charlie’s death personally and really care about finding the WHOLE truth. The frustration many have with TPUSA and Erika Kirk is that for some reason they don’t seem committed to that. When Andrew revealed that text message in the opening, it exposed that TPUSA was behind him… which has now amplified the frustration with them.



Mike
 
Candace: “Charlie sent a text to his team the day before he was assassinated saying “they” were going to kill him.”

Them: Liar! 🤡

Andrew: “Charlie sent a text to his team the day before he was assassinated saying “the Left” was going to kill him. Trust me Bro.”

Them: Oh, that’s the truth! 🤯

Make it make sense. 😂



Mike
 
AFTER THE SCORECARD — THE METHOD

Here’s what stood out to me:

Andrew repeatedly turned Candace’s narrower claims into stronger ones he could attack.

“Evidence supporting a possible patsy theory” became “prove he was a patsy.”

“Complicit somehow” became “complicit in Charlie’s death.”

A failed question about the charges became: “Okay, YOU name all seven.”

That’s the pattern:

Proposition substitution.
Burden inflation.
Question reversal.
Repetition after correction.
Selective evidentiary standards.

Candace repeatedly stopped him and brought him back to what she actually said.

That matters more than who sounded confident.

— CHATGPT

@ShawnRyan762 @RealCandaceO



Mike
 

Forum statistieken

Onderwerpen
4.715
Berichten
636.533
Leden
8.709
Nieuwste lid
Veer
Word vaste donateur van dit forum
Terug
Bovenaan