Mike
Andrew Wilson
- Onderwerp starter fatsnotbad
- Startdatum
Mike
There's much to say about the @RealCandaceO @paleochristcon debate, but this is perhaps the most significant.
Candace is inextricably connected to this case on a soul level. It has meaning beyond Tyler Robinson, another nation, the feds and certainly more than money, clicks or fame.
Andrew has no connection to this case; the outcome really doesn't matter much to him one way or the other.
Many people dislike Candace for her stance on one thing or the other and this case became a convenient weapon to club her with in order to discredit her entirely.
If you hate her for her stance on Israel, for example, you would try to destroy her credibility on this case as a method of negating her opinions as a whole.
Andrew saw an opportunity to pile-on to somebody catching lots of heat and be the savior. He could defend Erika, be the hero and take the "appeal to authority" position.
He thought his debate expertise would be sufficient even with limited knowledge of the case.
Yet, he underestimated how much deep meaning and soulful care can carry a person through a mismatch of skill.
This is how people succeed against all odds. This is how a mother can develop superhuman strength to lift a car off a baby trapped underneath. It defies logic, but it happens. It's called "hysterical strength."
Candace has a view of this case in a way nobody else could understand. Anyone else in her shoes might go crazy seeing the lies, the deception, the propaganda, the holes.. day after day.
She can't control what's happening so she did the one thing she could do, she started making noise. She turned on the camera and put her everything into figuring it out.
It's a pressure on her soul.
It's as clear to me as it was at the beginning: what she wants is the truth - even if it proves she's been wrong all along.
Remember, the alternative would be to do nothing at all.
I'd bet, she couldn't live with herself if she didn't at least try.
We'd all be lucky to have a friend like her.
Mike
Candace is inextricably connected to this case on a soul level. It has meaning beyond Tyler Robinson, another nation, the feds and certainly more than money, clicks or fame.
Andrew has no connection to this case; the outcome really doesn't matter much to him one way or the other.
Many people dislike Candace for her stance on one thing or the other and this case became a convenient weapon to club her with in order to discredit her entirely.
If you hate her for her stance on Israel, for example, you would try to destroy her credibility on this case as a method of negating her opinions as a whole.
Andrew saw an opportunity to pile-on to somebody catching lots of heat and be the savior. He could defend Erika, be the hero and take the "appeal to authority" position.
He thought his debate expertise would be sufficient even with limited knowledge of the case.
Yet, he underestimated how much deep meaning and soulful care can carry a person through a mismatch of skill.
This is how people succeed against all odds. This is how a mother can develop superhuman strength to lift a car off a baby trapped underneath. It defies logic, but it happens. It's called "hysterical strength."
Candace has a view of this case in a way nobody else could understand. Anyone else in her shoes might go crazy seeing the lies, the deception, the propaganda, the holes.. day after day.
She can't control what's happening so she did the one thing she could do, she started making noise. She turned on the camera and put her everything into figuring it out.
It's a pressure on her soul.
It's as clear to me as it was at the beginning: what she wants is the truth - even if it proves she's been wrong all along.
Remember, the alternative would be to do nothing at all.
I'd bet, she couldn't live with herself if she didn't at least try.
We'd all be lucky to have a friend like her.
Mike
Mike
Mike
Mike
Mike
Mike
Mike
Mike
Mike
Mike
Mike
Mike
Mike
Mike
Mike
Patrick: Hold on, you shared this tip with the highest levels of government, and they didn’t even bother to follow up on it?
Andrew: Well, how can we be certain that any of her sources are credible, or that she’s simply fabricating everything?
Candace: The exclusive evidence and stories I uncovered lend me a certain amount of credibility, don’t you think?
This debate has been phenomenal for Candace Owens and the truth.
Mike
Andrew: Well, how can we be certain that any of her sources are credible, or that she’s simply fabricating everything?
Candace: The exclusive evidence and stories I uncovered lend me a certain amount of credibility, don’t you think?
This debate has been phenomenal for Candace Owens and the truth.
Mike
Mike
Mike
Mike
Forum statistieken
