Globalisten & Cultureel Marxisme
- Onderwerp starter Dutch Engstrom
- Startdatum
De Amerikaanse Planet Fitness gym in de Verenigde Staten heeft de slogan “niet-veroordelende-zone” om inclusiviteit aan te moedigen. Een 34-jarige man interpreteerde dit als de vrijheid om naar de sportschool te gaan en zich volledig naakt uit te stretchen op een Yogamat.
https://fenixx.org/2018/07/25/sportschool-reclameert-niet-veroordelende-zone-te-zijn-man-gaat-compleet-naakt-yogaen/
Relativisme en nishilisme = recept voor grenzeloze waanzin.
Mike
https://fenixx.org/2018/07/25/sportschool-reclameert-niet-veroordelende-zone-te-zijn-man-gaat-compleet-naakt-yogaen/
Relativisme en nishilisme = recept voor grenzeloze waanzin.
Mike
Mike
Mike
Liberalism is a mental disorder:
Gerenommeerde psychiater: Linkse goedmensen zijn klinisch geestesziek
http://xandernieuws.punt.nl/content/2018/07/Gerenommeerde-psychiater-Linkse-goedmensen-zijn-klinisch-geestesziek
https://fenixx.org/2018/07/27/goedmensen-zijn-geestelijk-ziek-in-de-klinische-zin/
Mike
Gerenommeerde psychiater: Linkse goedmensen zijn klinisch geestesziek
http://xandernieuws.punt.nl/content/2018/07/Gerenommeerde-psychiater-Linkse-goedmensen-zijn-klinisch-geestesziek
https://fenixx.org/2018/07/27/goedmensen-zijn-geestelijk-ziek-in-de-klinische-zin/
Mike
Dutch Engstrom
New member
https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=374&v=VHHocQ3HoSc
Dutch Engstrom
New member
Is er hier behoefte aan meer achtergrond vdeo's en links aangaande cultureel Marxisme en de Frankfurt School e.d.? Kan me voorstellen dat dit in een ander topic al wel eens is besproken...
Wellicht alsnog handig om het wat overzichtelijk te houden.
Wellicht alsnog handig om het wat overzichtelijk te houden.
Als jij dat op je wil nemen, graag. Zelfs al is het eerder voorbijgekomen, het is superbelangrijk om 'the big picture' te begrijpen. Laat ik een voorzet nemen met een eerder geplaatst artikel van mijzelf:
https://www.dotcomnieuws.com/bewustzijn/hoe-tirannie-minstens-100-jaar-vermomd-is-als-vooruitgang-mensenrechten-en-burgerrechten/
Mike
https://www.dotcomnieuws.com/bewustzijn/hoe-tirannie-minstens-100-jaar-vermomd-is-als-vooruitgang-mensenrechten-en-burgerrechten/
Mike
https://tpo.nl/2018/07/29/bonusquote-hoe-amerikaanse-millennials-het-nieuwe-rode-gevaar-vormen/
Het gaat dus om deze stupide generatie:
Mike
Het gaat dus om deze stupide generatie:
Mike
De Nieuwe Wereldorde zal een krasse ongelijkheid van elite en massa zijn. De elite wil niets liever dan deze ongelijkheid. De wil is doordrenkt van diepe mensverachting. Het huidige woord voor massa is “de mensen”, die zich in het vervolg als nuttige dieren behandeld zullen zien worden, zowel migranten als niet migranten. De mensenrechten worden opgevoerd, terwijl het er in werkelijkheid om gaat hen af te schaffen.
“De mensen” in de Nieuwe Wereldorde zijn alleen nog maar van al hun rechten ontdane biologische eenheden, wier culturele behoefte worden teruggesnoeid tot “Tittytainment”. Dat is de “gelijkwaardigheid van de culturen”: alle mensen worden slaven. Het mantra-achtige gepraat over de gelijkwaardigheid camoufleert de daadwerkelijke bedoeling om een extreme ongelijkheid van de levensomstandigheden tot stand te brengen. Niet is voor allen, alles is voor slechts heel weinigen.
https://ejbron.wordpress.com/2018/07/29/longread-alle-mensen-worden-slaven-globalisering-of-de-dood/
Mike
“De mensen” in de Nieuwe Wereldorde zijn alleen nog maar van al hun rechten ontdane biologische eenheden, wier culturele behoefte worden teruggesnoeid tot “Tittytainment”. Dat is de “gelijkwaardigheid van de culturen”: alle mensen worden slaven. Het mantra-achtige gepraat over de gelijkwaardigheid camoufleert de daadwerkelijke bedoeling om een extreme ongelijkheid van de levensomstandigheden tot stand te brengen. Niet is voor allen, alles is voor slechts heel weinigen.
https://ejbron.wordpress.com/2018/07/29/longread-alle-mensen-worden-slaven-globalisering-of-de-dood/
Mike
https://tpo.nl/2018/07/30/het-klimaat-van-eeuwig-adolescentisme-van-de-jeugdige-westerling/
Mike
Mike
Dutch Engstrom
New member
Overzicht van Culture of Critique (Critical Theory is het handelsmerk van cultureel Marxisme; bekritiseer alles waar we in het Westen voor
staan en je ondermijnt de gehele cultuur. Zie het Westen vandaag de dag.):
&list=PLD2aXloRtVRcr6seNpwMd9V1EspwtfgIf&index=8
Analyse van de Frankfurt School en de meest invloedrijke aanhangers van cultureel Marxisme:
Korte uitleg van cultureel Marxisme:
De Joodse revolutie begon in Rusland en daarom kon Yuri Bezmenov er uitgebreid over vertellen:
staan en je ondermijnt de gehele cultuur. Zie het Westen vandaag de dag.):
&list=PLD2aXloRtVRcr6seNpwMd9V1EspwtfgIf&index=8
Analyse van de Frankfurt School en de meest invloedrijke aanhangers van cultureel Marxisme:
Korte uitleg van cultureel Marxisme:
De Joodse revolutie begon in Rusland en daarom kon Yuri Bezmenov er uitgebreid over vertellen:
Dutch Engstrom
New member
Of je wilt of niet, er is geen ontkomen aan identiteitspolitiek in een multiculturele samenleving.
Zie je hoe gevaarlijk vrouwen zijn i.c.m. de crimigranten die ze met open benen verwelkomen?
Mike
Mike
Dutch Engstrom
New member
Jup. Daar is maar 1 oplossing voor: het stemrecht ontnemen.
Daar zullen ze never-nooit mee akkoord gaan. We moeten slim te werk gaan, trust the plan. Daarom heb ik in een commentaar onder een video van Black Pigeon Speaks die hierover gaat het volgende geniale plan uit de doeken gedaan:
A return to old-style patriarchy may not be feasible at this moment. 100 years of socialist and crypto-marxist policies has made sure of that and so-called “conservative” women are not willing to go back to putting on aprons and baking blueberry pies anytime soon. Let’s face it, women are in the workplace now (even though it takes three women to do the work of one guy). Women also gained the right to vote, despite the fact that they are hyperemotional, low-information voters.
Here’s how I think we can fix this, though:
First of all, restore a merit-based system with equality of opportunity and not outcome. This is paramount. Sure, some women may actually qualify to be in a leadership position (and they are more than welcome), but most of them won’t. Women are collectivist followers, not individual leaders. But hey, it’s equality, right? Just not the type of equality women like to hide behind and that will automatically grant them all sorts of privileges. Now they will actually need to have skills and talents to show for it. With fewer opportunities available to them, based on their innate capabilities (which don’t hold a candle to those of men), many women will then choose to leave the workplace, get married, start a family and depend on their husbands again as the sole provider. No need to abolish female jobs, just no more gender quota and other insane state-enforced priviliges.
Secondly, introduce a merit-based system to stop women (and weak men) voting these socialist goons into office. Let’s restrict the right to vote to those, male or female, who contribute to and serve their country either economically or militarily. Ask not what your country can do for you, but what you can do for your country. Why should welfare queens and basement dwellers have voting rights anyway? Of course we should make an exception for retirees and veterans, since they have already served their nation. Voting rights used to be restricted to land ownership and early feminists lost their minds (even though 4 out of 10 men didn’t own property either, but don’t let logic get in the way of the female mind). Now it will be about the willingness to work or fight for your country. No rights without responsibiliies. Since women don’t like taking responsibility, they will drop out of the workforce and military en masse and start baking pies instead, thus giving up the right to vote. We’ll call it “fair inequality”, how about that?
This should level the playing field considerably. Those women (most likely tomboys with testosterone) willing to put in the extra hours and prove their worth will stay on, those that fail miserably at performing their duties and tasks (which is most of them) will either get fired or quit on their own accord. It literally won’t pay off anymore to be a “strong and independent” female – especially since there’s no welfare system to fall back on, thus forcing women to rely on their husbands once more. Welfare is the life blood of feminism, so let’s choke it at the source. Furthermore, put an end to legalized abortion. A nation that won’t take care of its kids has no future. Lastly, take divorce proceedings out of the family court system and put it back under contract law. Breaking up a marriage will then be equal to breaching a business agreement, for which you need to be able to produce factual proof. No more false rape and DV accusations! Custody should be awarded to those that are economically viable to provide for the kids (i.e. men). No more single moms and feminization of boys!
If we do this right we can close off all avenues and they won’t even know what hit them. Just use the words “fair” and “equal” a lot and appeal to their collectvism by emphasizing the good of the nation. To save face, the new feminism will be about women choosing to become homemakers themselves, which “conservative” feminist leaders will call “empowering” and a “women’s right” (and which also happens to be true). We all know there’s no such thing as a conservative or right-wing female, but once the societal tide turns they will go with the flow, as they’ve always done. Women don’t make decisions based on a sense of duty or loyalty – those are male values. Women are selfish, materialistic and hypergamous, so take away all their incentives and sell it as “fairness” and “equality” and they will voluntarily give up voting rights and become wives and mothers again.
I think my plan is genius, don’t you?
Mike
A return to old-style patriarchy may not be feasible at this moment. 100 years of socialist and crypto-marxist policies has made sure of that and so-called “conservative” women are not willing to go back to putting on aprons and baking blueberry pies anytime soon. Let’s face it, women are in the workplace now (even though it takes three women to do the work of one guy). Women also gained the right to vote, despite the fact that they are hyperemotional, low-information voters.
Here’s how I think we can fix this, though:
First of all, restore a merit-based system with equality of opportunity and not outcome. This is paramount. Sure, some women may actually qualify to be in a leadership position (and they are more than welcome), but most of them won’t. Women are collectivist followers, not individual leaders. But hey, it’s equality, right? Just not the type of equality women like to hide behind and that will automatically grant them all sorts of privileges. Now they will actually need to have skills and talents to show for it. With fewer opportunities available to them, based on their innate capabilities (which don’t hold a candle to those of men), many women will then choose to leave the workplace, get married, start a family and depend on their husbands again as the sole provider. No need to abolish female jobs, just no more gender quota and other insane state-enforced priviliges.
Secondly, introduce a merit-based system to stop women (and weak men) voting these socialist goons into office. Let’s restrict the right to vote to those, male or female, who contribute to and serve their country either economically or militarily. Ask not what your country can do for you, but what you can do for your country. Why should welfare queens and basement dwellers have voting rights anyway? Of course we should make an exception for retirees and veterans, since they have already served their nation. Voting rights used to be restricted to land ownership and early feminists lost their minds (even though 4 out of 10 men didn’t own property either, but don’t let logic get in the way of the female mind). Now it will be about the willingness to work or fight for your country. No rights without responsibiliies. Since women don’t like taking responsibility, they will drop out of the workforce and military en masse and start baking pies instead, thus giving up the right to vote. We’ll call it “fair inequality”, how about that?
This should level the playing field considerably. Those women (most likely tomboys with testosterone) willing to put in the extra hours and prove their worth will stay on, those that fail miserably at performing their duties and tasks (which is most of them) will either get fired or quit on their own accord. It literally won’t pay off anymore to be a “strong and independent” female – especially since there’s no welfare system to fall back on, thus forcing women to rely on their husbands once more. Welfare is the life blood of feminism, so let’s choke it at the source. Furthermore, put an end to legalized abortion. A nation that won’t take care of its kids has no future. Lastly, take divorce proceedings out of the family court system and put it back under contract law. Breaking up a marriage will then be equal to breaching a business agreement, for which you need to be able to produce factual proof. No more false rape and DV accusations! Custody should be awarded to those that are economically viable to provide for the kids (i.e. men). No more single moms and feminization of boys!
If we do this right we can close off all avenues and they won’t even know what hit them. Just use the words “fair” and “equal” a lot and appeal to their collectvism by emphasizing the good of the nation. To save face, the new feminism will be about women choosing to become homemakers themselves, which “conservative” feminist leaders will call “empowering” and a “women’s right” (and which also happens to be true). We all know there’s no such thing as a conservative or right-wing female, but once the societal tide turns they will go with the flow, as they’ve always done. Women don’t make decisions based on a sense of duty or loyalty – those are male values. Women are selfish, materialistic and hypergamous, so take away all their incentives and sell it as “fairness” and “equality” and they will voluntarily give up voting rights and become wives and mothers again.
I think my plan is genius, don’t you?
Mike
Dutch Engstrom
New member
Ik ben blij dat BPS Peterson's anti-identiteitspolitiek aanhaalt.
https://fenixx.org/2018/08/02/met-de-hollywood-film-schindlers-list-van-de-joodse-regisseur-steven-spielberg-begon-het-verzinsel-van-het-gevaar-van-rechts-door-de-linkspartei-en-de-grunen/
Mike
Mike
http://www.geennieuws.com/2018/08/het-einde-van-de-witte-wereld/
Mike
Mike
Medusa
Well-known member
Mooi artikel van Rypke Zeilmaker:
Dus nee NEE, ik zeg niet dat Wells al over transgender schreef. Denk AUB even een stapje verder, uit de geopolitieke angst voor overbevolking en haar vermeende samenhang met oorlog… De logica is natuurlijk: wanneer je vrouwen op een voetstuk zet en ze economiseert tot hun 40ste, castratie ( = transgender) en verwijving (homofielen) aanmoedigt, promoot je onvruchtbaarheid.
http://www.interessantetijden.nl/2018/08/02/homos-en-transgenders-brengen-de-wereldvrede-2030-agenda/
Dus nee NEE, ik zeg niet dat Wells al over transgender schreef. Denk AUB even een stapje verder, uit de geopolitieke angst voor overbevolking en haar vermeende samenhang met oorlog… De logica is natuurlijk: wanneer je vrouwen op een voetstuk zet en ze economiseert tot hun 40ste, castratie ( = transgender) en verwijving (homofielen) aanmoedigt, promoot je onvruchtbaarheid.
http://www.interessantetijden.nl/2018/08/02/homos-en-transgenders-brengen-de-wereldvrede-2030-agenda/
Forum statistieken
